본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

중재판정이 대법원에 의해 취소된 사례연구

이용수 10

영문명
A case study on the arbitration awards canceled by Korean Supreme Court
발행기관
한국중재학회
저자명
신한동
간행물 정보
『중재연구』 제21권 제1호, 33~56쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 무역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.03.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Korea Supreme Court has cancelled four cases of thirty-nine Arbitral awards made by Korean Commercial Arbitration Board since Korea arbitration act was enacted in 1966. Three cases of them were cancelled by the reason of the arbitrator’s disqualification in relation to impartiality or independence and the other to arbitration agreement enable to select the lawsuit or arbitration. When a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator or has already been appointed as such, he shall without delay disclose all circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality or independence according to the one of the article 13 of Korean Arbitration Act. Upon being notified of the appointment as an arbitrator, each arbitrator shall immediately disclose in writing to the Secretariat any circumstances which might cause reasonable doubt about impartiality or independence. An arbitration agreement shall be made clearly and in writing not to appeal to the court or to be brought in the court. However most of the korean construction contracts have the arbitration agreement clause enable to appeal to the court or the arbitration on government official’s advice. Many of these disputes are resolved by litigation after the precedent(Law case number : 2003da318) set by the Supreme Court on August 22, 2003 between the Korea(government) and the Korea Railroad or abandoned its attempt to arbitration. But each year, about four hundreds of arbitration business transactions were resolved arbitration, the voluntary submission of a dispute to an impartial person or persons for final and binding determination. Arbitration has proven to be an effective way to resolve these disputes privately, promptly, and economically.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 대법원에 의해 중재판정이 취소된 사례
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

신한동. (2011).중재판정이 대법원에 의해 취소된 사례연구. 중재연구, 21 (1), 33-56

MLA

신한동. "중재판정이 대법원에 의해 취소된 사례연구." 중재연구, 21.1(2011): 33-56

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제