본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

징벌적 손해배상의 중재적격

이용수 20

영문명
The Arbitrability of the Subject-matter of Punitive Damages
발행기관
한국중재학회
저자명
강수미
간행물 정보
『중재연구』 제21권 제1호, 3~31쪽, 전체 29쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 무역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.03.30
6,280

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In response to complexity and diversity of a social phenomenon, the dispute also is various, therefore can not be settled efficiently by means of court adjudication to which applies a law strictly. To overcome such problems we are going to seek to make use of arbitration. According to Korean Arbitration Act Art. 3 (1), any dispute in private laws would be the object of arbitral proceedings. It could be the object of arbitral proceedings that disputes which are capable of a settlement by arbitration. It is a matter for debate that disputes containing punitive damages may be resolved by arbitration. This problem is concerning the arbitrability of the subject-matter of a dispute. To offer some solution to these issues, it is necessary to inquire into the nature of punitive damages. the policy and function of alimony, the fair apportionment of a loss. Moreover, international relations formed with international transactions should be considered. Punitive damages would be the object of arbitral proceedings as the dipute in private laws. When punitive damages pursue only punishment in the domestic arbitration that there is not foreign factors, arbitral tribunal could not make arbitral award containing punitive damages. However, if punitive damages are admitted under the rules applicable to substance of dispute, and there is the arbitration agreement in which is implied that the parties agree to submit to an arbitral award, arbitral tribunal could make arbitral award containing punitive damages in international arbitration. When it is questionable whether it is offend against our public policy or not, that we accept the effect of arbitral award containing punitive damages, and we admit the enforcement of it, we have to take the nature of punitive damages, the policy and function of alimony, the fair apportionment of a loss and the stability of international transactions into consideration.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 징벌적 손해배상의 의의 및 본질
Ⅲ. 중재적격의 작용 국면
Ⅳ. 징벌적 손해배상의 중재적격
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

강수미. (2011).징벌적 손해배상의 중재적격. 중재연구, 21 (1), 3-31

MLA

강수미. "징벌적 손해배상의 중재적격." 중재연구, 21.1(2011): 3-31

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제