본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

요청조달계약상 입찰담합 행위자에 대한 수요기관의 설계보상비 반환 청구에 관한 검토

이용수 72

영문명
Review of a Demanding Agency’s Claim for Return of Design Compensation Fee to Bid Rigging Actors according to Request Procurement Contract
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
한태일(Han, Tae Il)
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第29卷 第2號, 101~125쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2018.12.30
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The payment of the design compensation fee for bid failures is aimed at reducing the burden on bidders and creating a fair competitive bidding environment. Therefore, it is natural to return the design compensation fee even if its lump sum is paid because the design compensation fee doesn’t have to be paid to the bid failures who have lost the bidding due to bid rigging. However, the bidder failures who have recently been caught bid rigging claim that there is no obligation to return the design compensation fee because the demanding agency is not the part of bid despite their big rigging upon request of the demanding agency to return the design compensation paid to them. And it seems that the trial court accepts some of these claims. However, in view of the Supreme Court s recognition that the demanding agency has the status as a beneficiary of the construction contract concluded between the ordering organization and the successful bidder in the recent request procurement contract, there is a possibility of claiming the return of the design compensation fee as a beneficiary. This is because the contract between the ordering organization and the successful bidder can be regarded as being established under the national contract law. In addition, regarding the bid failure who has conducted bid rigging claiming that the bidding is still valid because there is no declaration of invalidation and the requirements for the return of the design compensation fee have not been established, it is proper that the bidding becomes invalid immediately when bid rigging is found and the bidding failures paid with the design compensation fee should return it, comprehensively given that the relevant laws and regulations do not set separate procedures for invalidation of bids, it will eventually protect the bid rigging actors if it is not invalid, and that bidding should becomes invalid in consideration of the purpose of the Procurement Service’s interpretation criterion on the design compensation fee.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 수요기관의 설계보상비 반환청구 가능성
Ⅲ. 입찰무효와 설계보상비 반환청구
Ⅳ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

한태일(Han, Tae Il). (2018).요청조달계약상 입찰담합 행위자에 대한 수요기관의 설계보상비 반환 청구에 관한 검토. 법학연구, 29 (2), 101-125

MLA

한태일(Han, Tae Il). "요청조달계약상 입찰담합 행위자에 대한 수요기관의 설계보상비 반환 청구에 관한 검토." 법학연구, 29.2(2018): 101-125

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제