본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

자유와 공리의 연합

이용수 61

영문명
Union of Liberty and Utility
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
고봉진(Ko, Bong Jin)
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第29卷 第2號, 1~22쪽, 전체 22쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2018.12.30
5,440

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In recent decades ‘Minority problem’ has become a political issue, and ‘minority rights’, ‘minority identity’ and ‘minority movement’ have been highlighted in social theory. Minority problems arise when a few are oppressed by the majority. This is to solve the problem of suppressing women, foreigners, and homosexuals, who are a minority by men, their own nationals, and heterosexuals. In recent years, however, the collective nature of capitalism has raised many questions, not just minority oppressed by the majority. Although it is not repressed by the minority, the gap between those who have it and those who do not is increasing. The wealth gaps are beyond the negative gaps, manifesting the gaps in lifestyle, gaps in life, gaps in education, and gaps in freedom. In today’s society, the issue of ‘majority’ should become a political issue again. It became similar to the era when utilitarianism emerged. Utilitarianism has emerged as a progressive theory in the era when historically a small number of privileged parties enjoyed privileges over multiple sacrifices. In this paper, I try to consider ‘communitarianism’ first. My mind is bleak, because I critically examines the ‘best theory in the world’. ‘Communitarianism’ can not be used in modern society, although the theory itself is excellent. However, I believe that it is necessary to change the way of realizing the ‘value of community’ and ‘citizen’. On the other hand, ‘Liberalism’, a popular trend in modern thought, is at stake. It would be possible to work to bring the ideal of communitarianism, which is difficult to realize today, to a feasible level of ‘utilitarianism’. I think it is easier to agree on utility than to agree on ‘community values’. It is not difficult to prioritize community values i n ‘community’, but in ‘profit society’ it is better to give priority to ‘utility’ than ‘community value’. Utilitarianism and communitarianrism are similar in that they consider the whole rather than the individual, albeit a very different theory. Looking at the books by John Stuart Mill (‘Utilitarianism’, ‘On Liberty’, ‘The Subjection of Women’), I think we can complement the problem of liberalism today.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 현대 사회에서 ‘공동체’ 해법이 어려운 이유
Ⅲ. 자유주의의 명암(明暗)
Ⅳ. ‘공리주의’ 돌아보기
Ⅴ. 맺으며

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

고봉진(Ko, Bong Jin). (2018).자유와 공리의 연합. 법학연구, 29 (2), 1-22

MLA

고봉진(Ko, Bong Jin). "자유와 공리의 연합." 법학연구, 29.2(2018): 1-22

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제