명의신탁 관련한 형사법적 쟁점 개관

• 영문명: Overview on the Criminal Issues about Nominal Trust
• 발행기관: 충북대학교 법학연구소
• 저자명: 우인성(Woo In Sung)
• 간행물 정보: 『법학연구』第26卷 第2號, 457~493쪽, 전체 37쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.12.30

영문 초록

I think, except some cases that the “Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder's name”(below abbreviated as ‘Actual Name Law’) allows, the nominal trust agreement is not the trust relationship worthy of being protected by Criminal Law, even though the nominal trust is not Kondiktio wegen verwerflichen Empfanges. And the recent decision(2010do10500) changed the precedents about the non-punishable subsequent act. It held that, if the trustee took out mortgages two times or more from the same real estate under the nominal trust that Actual Name Law allows, the subsequent act could be punished. It means that the subsequent act constitutes the crime of embezzlement and is not absorbed in the preceding act of taking out a mortgage. I agree with the result, but the act of taking our mortages should be assessed as a criminal breach of trust, not as a embezzlement. In the other part, the nominal trust about the movable things were dealt with.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 부동산 명의신탁

Ⅲ. 부동산 명의신탁 약정에 의한 신뢰관계가 형사상 보호할 필요성 유무

Ⅳ. 명의신탁 부동산의 처분과 불가벌적 사후행위

Ⅴ. 동산 명의신탁

Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

명의신탁 보호할 가치 있는 신뢰관계 불법원인급여 불가벌적 사후행위 nominal trust trust relationship worthy of being protected by Criminal Law Kondiktio wegen verwerflichen Empfanges non-punishable subsequent act