학술논문
수사절차에서의 헌법원칙에 관한 소고
이용수 125
- 영문명
- The Study on the Constitutional Rules in the Procedure of Investigation
- 발행기관
- 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 저자명
- 신주호(Shin, Joo-Ho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第39輯 第3號, 143~182쪽, 전체 40쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2015.12.18
7,600원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Both major basic concepts of the crime investigation is the actual truth finding and the basic human rights guarantee. In this way, the crime investigation pursues the two nasic concepts of the actual truth finding and the human rights guarantee. However, the analysis of our investigation practices and norms shows that more emphasis has been put on the actual truth finding and that the investigation efficiency has been overemphasized.
However, the human rights guarantee is also the very important value in the two investigation concepts. The basic direction of investigation needs to be moved with the emphasis on the human rights guarantee in our society going toward the democratic society. The universality and importance of the human rights guarantee in the investigation procedures are the global flow and the contemporary current. In fact, the status of a suspect has been considered only as the object or subject of investigation in the current discussion on investigation. Namely, the major purpose of investigation is to collect the necessary evidences and secure the suspect's whereabouts to determine the prosecution for a certain criminal charge of the suspect. Hence, as the purposefulness to achieve the investigation purpose is strongly requested in the investigation procedures, the promptness and nondisclosure are required to prevent the escape or evidence destruction of the suspect. Moreover, the investigation agency's right of the compulsory measure is acknowledged, and the suspect has the obligation of accepting it. As a result, the suspect cannot have the status being comparable to that of the investigation agency and basically has the status of the object or subject of investigation. In view of the purposefulness and confidentiality of investigation, the status of the suspect in the investigation procedures doesn't strongly show the characteristics as the principal of the investigation procedures differently from
the status of the defendant in the trial proceedings being the offense and defense procedures proceeded in front of a judge. In the discussion on the investigation of a suspect as the investigation object, it cannot be acceptable anymore in our constitutional order emphasizing the human rights guarantee.
The realization of the justice through the actual truth finding in the criminal procedures is the natural request and duty of all constitutional states. Our constitution prepares the safety device of the binding constitutional principles for the protection of personal liberty in order to guarantee the personal liberty
easily infringed in the criminal procedures. The constitutional rules mean the constitutionally binding rinciples to be observed when the national power including the legislator actually restricts the
personal liberty. They are the principle of legality (Article 12 Provision 1 Statement 2 and the first part of Article 13 Provision 1), the principle of double jeopardy prevention (the latter part of Article 13 Provision 1), theprinciple of due process (Article 12 Provision 1), the warrant requirement
(Article 12 Provision 3 and Article 16), the principle of the presumption of innocence (Article 27 Provision 4), the principle of limiting the evidential admissibility or probative power of confession (Article 12 Provision 7), and the principle of excluding the illegally acquired evidence.
One of the reasons why the investigation conduct and practice not sincerelysecuring the human rights guarantee have been widespread so far is basically the biased and incorrect understanding of the basic concept of investigation.Therefore, our current cons titution also puts no less emphasis on the humanrights guarantee of a suspect than on the actual fact finding. The criminal procedures law should be prepared on the basis of the spirit of the constitution, and it is necessary to focus on the importance of the human rights guarantee
furthermore in the investiga ti
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 형벌불소급의 원칙
Ⅲ. 이중처벌금지의 원칙
Ⅳ. 적법절차의 원칙
Ⅴ. 영장주의
1. 의 의
2. 예 외
Ⅵ. 무죄추정의 원칙
1. 증거법상 무죄추정원칙
2. 인신구속의 제한 원리
3. 불이익 처우의 금지
4. 적용영역
Ⅶ. 자백의 증거능력 제한
1. 증거능력의 제한
2. 증명력의 제한
Ⅷ. 위법수집증거배제의 원칙
Ⅸ. 미란다 원칙
Ⅹ. 맺는말
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 해방기(1945—1948) 헌법초안의 사법조항 분석
- 전자정보의 증거능력을 둘러싼 쟁점별 검토와 해석론
- 자율주행자동차 관리 및 교통사고에 대한 형사책임
- 통일한국의 행정조직통합을 위한 법⋅제도적 방안
- 정보비대칭성하에서 설명의무의 본질에 관한 소고 장외파생상품 설명의무의 제도·경제적 접근을 중심으로
- 피보험자가 정신질환을 이유로 자살한 경우 면책조항에 관한 검토
- 징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성
- 수사절차에서의 헌법원칙에 관한 소고
- 세월호 집회시 경찰의 차벽 설치에 대한 위헌성 및 권리구제방안
- 유럽공통매매법안에서의 매도인의 추완권에 관한 연구
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!