상피제거회전솔을 이용한 굴절교정레이저각막절제술과 상피통과굴절교정레이저각막절제술의 임상결과 비교

• 영문명: Comparison of Clinical Results between Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Brush Photorefractive Keratectomy
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 강현승 최철명 최태훈 김세경,Hyunseung Kang, MD, Chul Myong Choe, MD, Tae Hoon Choi, MD, PhD, Se Kyung Kim, MD
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume55,number9, 1284~1290쪽, 전체 7쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.09.15

영문 초록

Purpose: To compare the results of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (trans PRK) and brush-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (brush PRK) for the treatment of myopia. Methods: A total of 146 eyes from 78 patients who received brush PRK or trans PRK with the Schwind Amaris laser platform were included in the present study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) at postoperative 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were compared between the 2 groups as well as epithelial healing time. Results: The mean time to complete epithelial healing was 3.27 ± 0.75 days in the trans PRK group and 3.67 ± 0.93 days in the brush PRK group (p < 0.05). At 1 week after surgery, UDVA recovered more rapidly after trans PRK than brush PRK (brush PRK: 0.13 ± 0.12 log MAR units, trans PRK: 0.09 ± 0.08 log MAR units, p < 0.05), however, UDVA was not significantly different at 1, 3, 6, and, 12 months postoperatively between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Re-epithelialization and visual recovery were faster in the trans PRK group while visual outcome and postoperative complications were equivalent to the brush PRK group.J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2014;55(9):1284-1290

키워드

Brush-assisted photorefractive keratectomy, Epithelial healing time, Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy