학술논문
가사비송절차에서의 절차보장
이용수 133
- 영문명
- Procedural Guarantee in Family Non-litigation Procedures
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김원태(Kim, Won-Tae)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第24卷 第2號, 335~358쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.12.31
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
There have been few domestic discussions of procedural guarantee in family non-litigation procedure in Korea. The purpose of this study is to identify procedural guarantee in non-litigation procedure, particularly family non-litigation procedure and to examine specific contents of such guarantee.
Related to procedural guarantee recently, there have been qualitative changes from formal minimum opportunity such as the existing right to express opinion and right of application for dissatisfaction into substantial, effective function guarantee accompanied with procedural consideration for persons related. It is needed to establish substantial procedural guarantee independently in order to secure justification of procedures even in non-litigation cases.
There have been controversies of the independent position and cooperative obligation of the persons related to non-litigation case procedures. However, due to the restrictions in the theory to detect authority, it is reasonable to approve the cooperative obligation in procedure of the parties concerned that has duplicity in procedural guarantee for the parties concerned. In the family non-litigation procedures, the theory to detect authority and the theory of cooperative obligation in procedure may be compatible.
Requests of independent position and procedural guarantee of the persons related to procedure may be retreated when simplicity, flexibility, and rapidity of procedure are underlined in order to secure formation of sponsored legal relation in family non-litigation cases and headship of court. However, it is needed of sufficient procedural guarantee for the persons related to family non-litigation procedures. Opportunities to express opinions by the parties concerned and the persons related should be secured on data for decision during the course of judgment procedures without asking of Ra or Ma types. Thus, the author of this study suggest that it may be needed to establish regulations of obligations of court and the parties concerned and the right to express opinion.
As long as family case judgment is public service, procedural guarantee may take an important share in qualitative guarantee of the service as the purpose of family case judgment. In this context, theory of procedural guarantee in family non-litigation may become a basis not only to legitimize family trial system as a national system but to secure public confidence on family trial procedures.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 형식적 절차보장에서 실질적 절차보장으로
Ⅲ. 비송사건절차에서의 절차보장
Ⅳ. 가사비송절차와 절차보장
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 로스쿨에서의 실무교육
- The Advent of the Law School Firm in the United States
- 성년후견제도의 시행과 과제
- 法科大学院教育と早稲田大学の実務教育のための二つの法律事務所
- 시공참여자의 근로자성
- 러시아 연방 사법 제도
- 중국 로스쿨과 로펌의 관계에 대한 소고
- 재산분할과 재혼
- 예술가의 사회적 지위 보장을 위한 법제연구
- 婚姻関係解消に伴う様々な法律問題
- 论新时期我国婚姻家庭法律制度的发展与变化
- 임금채권보장법상 체당금제도의 문제점과 개선방안
- 일본의 녹색성장 관련 정책 변화에 관한 법제 연구
- 프랑스민법상 일반양자제도
- 中国继承法修改的热点问题
- 가사비송절차에서의 절차보장
- 中国劳动纷争解决制度之改善方案
- 21세기 러시아의 법학 교육
- 의료정보보호에 관한 입법방향
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!