학술논문
시공참여자의 근로자성
이용수 57
- 영문명
- Determining Whether to Accept or Reject Construction Participants’ Achieving Workers’Status
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 박재동(Park, Jae-Dong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第24卷 第2號, 33~56쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.12.31
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In the oligopolistic market structure in which large enterprises predominate the acceptance of construction order, the construction industry is multi-phased: most construction companies are incorporated into the subcontractors of big enterprises and subcontracting construction companies resubcontract small specialty contractor and resubcontracting companies subcontract construction participants over again.
Due to the specialization of construction, another characteristic of the construction industry is that construction is done by construction participants. Allowing for these circumstances, the previous Framework Act on the Construction Industry had the system for “construction participants.” The subcontract phases of this construction work ranges from phase 1 to phase 5; therefore, those who really perform construction work in the last phase are mostly construction participants and daily workers.
Construction companies have performed construction work by making an inexpensive subcontract with construction participants, thereby maximizing the pursuit of profits of the original contractor, and have shifted all responsibilities onto the construction participants when there were any accidents occurred in the course of construction and/or overdue wages. In order to prevent these problems, the system for construction participants was abolished by the revision of Framework Act on the Construction Industry on May 17, 2007. Nevertheless, the practice of illegal subcontracting has still continued on construction sites. In this way, the fact that construction participants take all responsibility as the status of the original contractor and employer has caused social problems such as daily workers’ overdue wages.
Judging from the fact that construction participants perform subcontract work under the direct control, command and supervision of the construction company, and receive labor costs for their work, it is clear that they have workers’ status. Therefore, if the Labor Standards Act is revised to include construction participants in the category of workers, the abrogation of the system for construction participants will settle down.
Since it is illegal to give construction participants subcontract for construction and thus is considered an illegal act, i.e. unlicensed construction, it is required that the administrative agency strictly control and punish this illegal subcontracting. Moreover, since the subcontracting structure tends not to become known to outsiders except site workers, it is necessary to consider introducing the reward system for reporting illegal subcontracting and/or establish a report center on a regular basis. In this way, if legislative improvements are made, the effects resulting from abolishing the system for construction participants on construction sites will appear and be expected to help more in acquiring construction industry workers’ wage claims.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 건설하도급의 현황 및 시공참여자의 역기능
Ⅲ. 근로자성 여부에 대한 견해와 외국사례
Ⅳ. 근로자성 배제에 따른 문제점과 근로자성 검토
Ⅴ. 입법적 개선방안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 로스쿨에서의 실무교육
- The Advent of the Law School Firm in the United States
- 성년후견제도의 시행과 과제
- 法科大学院教育と早稲田大学の実務教育のための二つの法律事務所
- 시공참여자의 근로자성
- 러시아 연방 사법 제도
- 중국 로스쿨과 로펌의 관계에 대한 소고
- 재산분할과 재혼
- 예술가의 사회적 지위 보장을 위한 법제연구
- 婚姻関係解消に伴う様々な法律問題
- 论新时期我国婚姻家庭法律制度的发展与变化
- 임금채권보장법상 체당금제도의 문제점과 개선방안
- 일본의 녹색성장 관련 정책 변화에 관한 법제 연구
- 프랑스민법상 일반양자제도
- 中国继承法修改的热点问题
- 가사비송절차에서의 절차보장
- 中国劳动纷争解决制度之改善方案
- 21세기 러시아의 법학 교육
- 의료정보보호에 관한 입법방향
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!