학술논문
재산분할과 재혼
이용수 100
- 영문명
- Division of Property and Remarriage
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 전경근(Jun, Gyung-Gun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第24卷 第2號, 139~158쪽, 전체 19쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.12.31
5,080원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
One of the parties, who have been divorced by agreement, may claim a division of property against the other party. However no agreement is made for a division of property, or it is impossible to reach an agreement, the Family Court shall, upon a request of the parties, determine the amount and method of division, considering the amount of property acquired by cooperation of both parties and other circumstances.
In this case, the division of marital property that is the subject of cooperation of both parties is achieved during marriage. However, civil law is not clearly defined the cooperation of both parties that have achieved by both parties. So it is frequently emitted what is the subject of property division. In this paper, especially it is the subject of my interest that the property which was owned by a spouse before marriage is subject to divided. Scholars plead that inherent properties before the marriage do not be the subject of property division. However, if one of the couple contributed to the prevention of the reduction of the properties or increase of the other’s inherent properties, those properties are subject to division. Moreover the Supreme Court sentenced that the inherent property, as a rule, are not subject to division. However, one party distributed actively to cooperate in the maintenance of inherent property of the other party or to prevent the decrease in the multiplication of inherent property.
In this case that we study on, there is no increase of marital property during marriage. Nevertheless, the court divided the property of the defendant to the plaintiff. I think this conclusion is unreasonable. Because the property that the court sentenced to divide to plaintiff is the inherent property that defendant had before the marriage.
In the case of divorce, division of property which is acquired by cooperation of both parties is natural. However, in the case of remarriage, division of property is considered more carefully. Because, in the case of remarriage, the inherent property of one party is subject to divided.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 대상판결의 정리
Ⅲ. 평석
Ⅳ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 로스쿨에서의 실무교육
- The Advent of the Law School Firm in the United States
- 성년후견제도의 시행과 과제
- 法科大学院教育と早稲田大学の実務教育のための二つの法律事務所
- 시공참여자의 근로자성
- 러시아 연방 사법 제도
- 중국 로스쿨과 로펌의 관계에 대한 소고
- 재산분할과 재혼
- 예술가의 사회적 지위 보장을 위한 법제연구
- 婚姻関係解消に伴う様々な法律問題
- 论新时期我国婚姻家庭法律制度的发展与变化
- 임금채권보장법상 체당금제도의 문제점과 개선방안
- 일본의 녹색성장 관련 정책 변화에 관한 법제 연구
- 프랑스민법상 일반양자제도
- 中国继承法修改的热点问题
- 가사비송절차에서의 절차보장
- 中国劳动纷争解决制度之改善方案
- 21세기 러시아의 법학 교육
- 의료정보보호에 관한 입법방향
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!