해부학적 인형 사용과 조사자의 질문유형에 따른 성폭력 피해 아동의 반응 연구

• 영문명: Analysis of alleged sexual-abuse child victims' responses according to anatomical doll use and question types
• 발행기관: 한국피해자학회
• 저자명: 이재웅(Jaewoong Lee) 조은경(Eunkyung Jo)
• 간행물 정보: 『피해자학연구』제17권 제2호, 133~149쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.12.31

영문 초록

In the present study, we hypothesized that child victims' reactions to anatomical dolls might interact with interviewer's utterance types. We analyzed child victims' response types with regard to anatomical dolls' utterance types, to examine how an anatomical doll can affect child victims' response, researchers analyzed child victims' responses according to the presence of the anatomical doll with additional factor, the type of interviewer's utterance. Five video-recorded child sexual abuse victim interviews with an anatomical doll were analyzed. The victims were from two age groups, 3 years(n=3) and 5 years(n=1), and included one boy. All videotapes were transcribed and two trained coders categorized verbal and nonverbal responses of the child and investigator. The trained coders first identified segments where anatomical dolls were used(doll phase) versus not used(no doll phase). After that, interviewer's utterances and child victim's responses were coded according to a coding scheme. Descriptive analysis of the data revealed that the interviewers frequently used directive utterances, option-posing questions, and suggestive questions throughout the interview. The interviewers employed cued invitation and multiple questions more in the doll phase than in the no-doll phase. Child victims showed digressive responses more frequently in the doll phase than in the no doll phase. It was also found that digressive behaviors tended to appear with directive utterances, option-posing questions, and suggestive questions by the interviewers. The results suggest that in general investigators were less likely to use open-ended questions when interviewing child victims, especially younger victims. Moreover, when interviewers used anatomical dolls combined with directive or close-ended utterances, younger children were more likely to become distracted from the interview. It can be inferred that children younger than 5 years old may consider the doll as a plaything rather than a demonstrative aid, thus, may not focus on the interviewer's words, and may become easily inattentive. The fact that child victims were not given understandable instructions about the purpose of an anatomical doll during the interview might have contributed to the child's digressive responses. There is a limitation of generalizing the results of this study, however, because of its small sample size. Thus, a further sophisticated field study with a larger sample would be needed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 연구 배경

Ⅲ. 연구방법

Ⅳ. 연구결과

Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

성폭력 피해 아동 해부학적 인형 조사자 질문 유형 아동 반응 유형 anatomical doll child sexual abuse investigative interviewing question types