본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

랑시에르의 민주주의와 ‘인민’(demos): 지성적 평등과『프롤레타리아의 밤』

이용수 2821

영문명
Democracy of Rancière and ‘People’(demos): Intelligent Equality and Proletarian Nights
발행기관
한국비평이론학회
저자명
신명아(Myoung Ah Shin)
간행물 정보
『비평과 이론』제17권 2호, 147~175쪽, 전체 29쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 영어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.12.31
6,280

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Jacques Rancière developed his notion of ‘people’(demos) and their importance in the fulfillment of Democracy early in his life from his work of Proletarian Nights: The Worker’s Dream in Nineteenth-Century France. This essay focuses on his ways of establishing a truly democratic system dealing with people, especially people excluded in the system of power of ‘police,’ the so-called ‘people of no share’. This paper will pay attention to how Rancière accuses other theorists such as Marx, Althusser, Foucault, Hardt and Negri for failing to see the role of people in their visions of better life for humans in their societies. This paper tries to shed light on the ways Rancière appreciates people of labor themselves in their effort to develop their intelligence admist of their hard works as laborers, base on his belief of intelligent equality of people. Rancière stresses that people are equipped with intelligent equality without needing to be led by the philosophers as visualized in Plato, because they themselves are poets and philosophers in their own ways. In discussing this aspect, the theorist of education dealing with the less privileged in our society, Jacotot, will be focused with his democratic ideals and belief in the intelligent equality of the people who were supposedly believed to be lacking in intelligence and in need of being guided by the teachers and philosophers. In concluding the paper, similarity and difference between Rancière and Laclau will be discussed so that Rancière’s theory of democracy and people will be defended from the attacks that his theory ignores identity politics and commits some kind of populism with his emphasis on people.

목차

랑시에르의 인민과 민주주의의 관계
지성적 평등과 프롤레타리아의 밤
‘알튀세르의 교훈’과‘랑시에르의 교훈’
결론: 계급투쟁 아니면 집단적 의지(collective will)?
인용 문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

신명아(Myoung Ah Shin). (2012).랑시에르의 민주주의와 ‘인민’(demos): 지성적 평등과『프롤레타리아의 밤』. 비평과 이론, 17 (2), 147-175

MLA

신명아(Myoung Ah Shin). "랑시에르의 민주주의와 ‘인민’(demos): 지성적 평등과『프롤레타리아의 밤』." 비평과 이론, 17.2(2012): 147-175

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제