본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

스펙터클과 중력의 무대: 랑시에르와 영화의 관객성

이용수 1739

영문명
Spectacle and Gravitational Stage: Rancière and Cinematic Spectatorship
발행기관
한국비평이론학회
저자명
남수영(Soo-Young Nam)
간행물 정보
『비평과 이론』제17권 2호, 123~146쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 영어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.12.31
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Visibility is made by unequal distribution of sensible shares in artistic regime. Rancière argues that real politics becomes possible only in the aesthetic regime by redistribution and recoordination of the sensible, unlike “polis” maintaining pre-existing orders among visible shares. Even though we accept spectacularization of the invisible as a political action to examine the labor(er) set on stage, we still need to face double-sided criticism: the “artistic” point of view which dismisses normal labor as unworthy of representation; and the standpoint of “truth” which disapproves the spectacularized labor(er) as far from the reality in our daily world. The problems here is clear: the one reproduces the conformists’ logic of polis that laborers on the street should return to their work site; and the other blocks any possibility that laborers can attain sensible shares and therefore, political effectivity. In order to stand against such paralyzing criticisms, this essay suggests that we accept the separation between the visible and the invisible as given so that it can be a loss (of sameness); then, identification of the respective subjects (i.e. the represented and the spectator) will be a starting point to make actions to produce effectivity for both political and artistic goals. On the other hand, such actions discussed in this essay also throw lights on the discourse of spectators’ emancipation. Validity of reformers’ critiques should be questioned because the beholder always means a passive being who must turn into the activist: the “beholder” does not exist any more when s/he always makes the one who should stop seeing and start acting. This problem is not unrelated to the circumstances which do not allow the labor(er) to become visible. Therefore, reexamining laborers as the spectacle on stage purported in this paper aims at double targets: spectacularization of the traditionally invisible should accept disagreements in identification of the staged; representation of the laborer can achieve artistic values, as the art of spectacle does not exclude the gravitational influence after all. Cinematic experiences exemplify this well: this spectacle industry is founded on the forces of working class; and rediscovering the alienated labor on screen easily confirms the continuity between the spectacle(laborer) and the spectator.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 감각의 재분배와 지능의 불평등: 스펙터클로서의 노동
Ⅲ. 평등한 지능과‘해방’의 의미
Ⅳ. 스펙터클과 중력: 생산자의 시선 vs 관람자의 시선
Ⅴ. 결론: 무/중력의 판타지와 해방
인용문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

남수영(Soo-Young Nam). (2012).스펙터클과 중력의 무대: 랑시에르와 영화의 관객성. 비평과 이론, 17 (2), 123-146

MLA

남수영(Soo-Young Nam). "스펙터클과 중력의 무대: 랑시에르와 영화의 관객성." 비평과 이론, 17.2(2012): 123-146

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제