죽음과 죽음욕동의 담론들: 프로이트, 라캉, 하이데거

• 영문명: Discourses on Death and the Death Drive: Freud, Lacan, and Heidegger
• 발행기관: 한국비평이론학회
• 저자명: 김성호(Sungho Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『비평과 이론』제17권 2호, 41~72쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.12.31

영문 초록

This essay is a comparative examination of three discourses on death and/or the death drive. From Beyond the Pleasure Principle onwards Freud builds and rebuilds the hypothesis of the death drive. His initial idea is profoundly conservative as well as dualistic. It suffers substantial changes as he turns the death drive into an aggressivity working against “the Nirvana principle.” Still, the conservative character of the drive remains, for the pleasure of aggression means the taming of the death drive by Eros, at least in the masochistic subject. Lacan, likewise, explains the death drive in several different ways. It lies in the signifying chain as the cause of “aphanisis” (the disappearance of the subject); it suggests itself in various attacks on the human Gestalt resulting in imagos of the fragmented body; or it expresses the ontological“limit” of the historical subject as the returning past. Seemingly Lacan moves on from Freud’s biological conservatism, but things are ambivalent due to the everydayness of the function of the Lacanian death drive. It might even be said that, in comparison, Freud has more clues to the radical withdrawal from mundane modernity. Lacan’s invocation of Heidegger with regard to the “limit” is justified only to a limited extent. Heidegger promotes, as Freud and Lacan do, the idea that life and death (or nothingness) belong together. Yet the possibility of death, for the German philosopher, is also the sole source of Dasein’s singularity and authentic Being. An “anticipation” (Vorlaufen) of death makes Dasein free from its own tenaciousness at the same time as it renders Dasein’s “Being-with” (communality) authentic. These differences notwithstanding, the three discourses on death deliver insights into the negativity that introduces rupture and rejuvenation into life’s progress.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 프로이트 욕동론의 변화과정

Ⅲ. 라캉의 개입

Ⅳ. 하이데거 vs. 라캉/프로이트

Ⅴ. 결론

인용 문헌

Abstract

키워드

삶욕동 죽음욕동 마조히즘 양극성 보수성 소외 아파니시스 한계 각자성 죽음을 향한 존재 선구 life drive death drive masochism polarity conservativeness alienation aphanisis limit mineness Being-towards-death anticipation