학술논문
제인 오스틴, 노예제, 계급, 인종
이용수 755
- 영문명
- Jane Austen, Slavery, Class and Race: A Study of Mansfield Park
- 발행기관
- 한국영미어문학회
- 저자명
- 허정애(Jeong-Ae Huh)
- 간행물 정보
- 『영미어문학』영미어문학 제99호, 89~112쪽, 전체 24쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2011.06.30
5,680원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
From Edward Said, who criticized Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park(1814) as a colonialist novel upholding slavery in his Culture and Imperialism(1993) to Gabrielle White who criticized Said and defended Austen as an abolitionist in his Jane Austen in the Context of Slavery(2006), the dispute on whether Austen is an abolitionist or not has been developing fiercely between feminists and postcolonialists for the last two decades. Austen’s indirect and ambiguous description of the slavery questions in Mansfield Park has made criticism more controversial.
For a persuasive solution to this controversy over Austen and slavery, a complex reading from the perspective of gender, class and race is required. Though it is true that Austen is interested in gender questions, her concern is only in white English women. She is indifferent to other race’s dual exploitations, sexual and racial. As for class, though Austen is a sensitive commentator of various levels of classes, her major concern is the upper class, not the ‘social other,’ lower class which includes workers or servants. Austen’s conception of the ‘social other’ in the novel is connected with that of the ‘racial other,’ black or mulatto in the West Indies. For Austen, ‘racial other’ is the source of anxiety because English pure blood can be tainted by miscegenation between other races. This is significant in the sense that the anxiety about miscegenation and hybridity, which is prevalent in the Victorian Age, already germinated in Austen.
Considering Austen’s emphasis on ‘Englishness’ through all of her works, it is very hard to find a reason why Austen would oppose slavery, the economic foundation of British imperialism. Austen exploits the West Indies as the property of England and doesn’t listen to pain, repression and exploitation of slaves working there. Thus, those critics insisting that Austen is an abolitionist just seems to be participate in the ‘saving English Austen’ movement.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며: 18세기 후반과 19세기 초반의 영국 노예제 담론
Ⅱ. 『맨스필드 파크』에 나타난 노예제의 양상
Ⅲ. 사회적 타자
Ⅳ. 인종적 타자
Ⅴ. 나가며
인용문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 할렘 르네상스에서의 진 투머의 위상
- (En)Gendering History in Don DeLillo’s Libra
- 성별에 따른 은유 표현의 인식 방법
- 남근지배
- Critical Reflection, EFL Education Reforms, and the Role of EFL Teacher Education
- A Study of Foreign Language Learning Motivation in Korean University Students
- Preposition Errors in Writing and Speaking by Korean EFL Learners
- 다양성속의 단일성
- The Photographic Images in the Works of William Carlos Williams and Charles Sheeler
- 영어 발음평가에서 한국인 영어교사의 평가 일관성과 듣기 숙련도의 관계
- 제인 오스틴, 노예제, 계급, 인종
- A Study on the Collocation Ability of Korean High School Students and Teaching Strategies
- 글쓰기와 읽기를 통해본 나보코프의 존재론적 사유
- 수잔 로리 팍스의 포스트모던 고고학
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!