학술논문
중국전통시대의 서술에서 정통의 문제
이용수 228
- 영문명
- The Orthodoxy in Historical Description of Chinese History
- 발행기관
- 한국사학사학회
- 저자명
- 권중달(Kwon, Joong-Dal)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국사학사학보』제13권, 175~184쪽, 전체 10쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 역사학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.06.30
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In Chinese history, innumerable dynasties have gone through rises and falls. Whenever a new dynasty was established, it proclaimed it's orthodoxy based on the legitimacy of its succession of the throne. This so-called ‘orthodoxy’claim served as a political agenda to gain control over the people. The reasoning behind its claim comes from the ‘principal of abdication’ by the former dynasty, stating that only the competent shall succeed to the throne. There also exists the ‘principal of wuxing(五行)’ that refers the
succession of throne through the provision of nature. The legitimacy was sometimes backed by the claim that the new dynasty shares the same ancestry with the former dynasty. Some argued their legitimacy with its
possession of a territory, and others reasoned with their ethics. Many people who established the dynasty claimed that the dynasty they built had legitimacy. The question whether a dynasty was legitimate or not
left to historians to work out the many theories. However, even the historians had different thoughts and opinions; some justified and others criticized the dynasty. After observing that the historians greatly influenced the legitimacy of adynasty, the government dominated the historians to write a history. This led
to a problem that the theory of legitimacy of a dynasty was determined by the people who had power. However, it was limited to situations only if the possibly controlable territories were secured. Therefore, it has come to the understanding that the theory of legitimacy of establishment of a dynasty is not a theory that can be applied to all periods, but a theory that has been developed to suit the spirit of a certain period.
목차
1. 정통성의 중요성과 정통론들
2. 역사가에게 판단이 맡겨진 왕조 정통성
3. 객관적 역사서술의 태도와 정통론의 문제
4. 결 론 - 정통론을 어떻게 볼 것인가? -
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!