학술논문
辯護士의 利害衝突 防止義務
이용수 125
- 영문명
- Lawyers' Duty to Avoid the Conflict of Interest
- 발행기관
- 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 저자명
- 李相敦(Lee, Sang-Don)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第33輯 第2號, 5~46쪽, 전체 42쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.12.31
7,840원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Legal ethic or lawyers' professional responsibility is a largely neglected area of legal study in Korea. However, it will attract more concern from lawyers and academics as the legal ethic is now designated as the bar examination subject.
Among many topics of the legal ethic, the duty to avoid the conflict of interest is the weakest point. In fact, the ethic standard in Korea is very fragile and weak. Though the conflict of interest is the basic ethic rule in the society, it is stll largely ignored in Korea.
Current Korean law and code for the lawyers' duty to avoid the conflict of interest is very incomplete and vulnerable. On the other hand, the U.S. has elaborate and detailed rules on that matter. This article is to analyze the various aspects of the lawyers' duty to avoid the conflict of interest in the U.S. ABA Model Rules on Professional Conduct has long and detailed provisions, the rules on the current clients, former clients, imputation to other lawyers, and former government officers and employees. These rules are now adopted in all the states through legislation.
This article analyzes ABA's rules on the conflict of interest and related cases. Leading cases such as Cuyer v. Sullivan, Wheat v. U.S., Westing House Electrics Co. v. Kerr-McGee Co., Brennan's Inc. v. Brennan's Restaurants, Inc., In re American Airlines, Inc., Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, and Armstrong v. McAlpine are also analyzed. The article argues that as the current Korean law and code on this matter is too weak and incomplete, Korea should incorporate ABA rules and related case law.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 이해충돌 방지의무에 관한 미국변호사 협회 모델 규칙
Ⅲ. 형사재판에서의 이해충돌
Ⅳ. 민사사건에서의 공동대리 문제
Ⅴ. 과거의 의뢰인을 상대로 한 대리
Ⅵ. 로펌에서의 동료 변호사로 인한 대리 제한
Ⅶ. 정부에 재직했던 변호사
Ⅷ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!