학술논문
名譽毁損의 민사적 법률관계
이용수 109
- 영문명
- Defamation in Civil Law : concentrated to American Torts
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 전광백(Kwang-Baek Jun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제15권 제4호, 379~445쪽, 전체 67쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.12.30
10,840원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Nowadays, all countries pursuing democracy ensure the securing of human dignity and freedom of speech and the press. These are counted as core values of government goals as constitution rights. The freedom of speech and the press means a freedom of expression in which people show their opinion, thoughts, and emotions without restriction. Criticism of other is also categorized under freedom of speech the reputation, a sort of personal right.
Meanwhile, criticism of others is sometimes connected to defamation, when freedom of speech conflicts with reputation.
In a case where excessive and immoderate expression results in defamation, the offender no doubt should be charged with a crime or compensation for damages.
Concerns about compensation for damages in defamation cases began on a large scale from the early 1980's in Korea. Defamation consists of torts, based on civil code article 750. But The above article prescribes only general requirements of torts, while more concrete requirements and privileged matters on defamation had not been standardized yet by case or legal theories.
In the United States, defamation has been recognized as a sort of tort and the requirements of it had been decided in detail by courts. The legal theories that have been developed by the Federal Supreme Court to distinguish freedom of expression from defamation are detailed and subtle. The legal theories of defamation in America must have affected our legal ones considerably, so much that essential parts of decisions on defamation made by the Federal Supreme Court have been quoted by the Supreme Court or The Constitution Court in Korea.
In this article, the requirements of defamation (injury to reputation, publication, plaintiff and defendant, false facts, opinions, etc). privilege, and liability that were developed in common law and case law in America have been researched in depth.
It is improper to accept fully the American theories of defamation in Korea because there are differences of legal systems and emotions toward the law between Korea and the USA, rooted from english - american law.
We have only two clauses about defamation. One is civil code article 750, which provides the general requirements of torts. And the other is civil code article 751, which provides liability for defamation. Except for these, we have no clauses that provide specific requirements and privileges. So, to embody the requirements and privileges of defamation would make the parties to a suit get foreseeability, and then it leads legal stability and contributes to development of legal theories of defamation.
In Korea, the requirements and exemption of illegality of defamation have been applied in civil law almost the same as in criminal law, so that if defamation were recognized I criminal law, the liability for defamation could be recognized.
The case law in America, developing the legal theories about requirements, privileges, and liability of defamation in solving cases, included diverse and concrete facts, pursued the valance of constitutional value, the freedom of expression and securing personal rights, are expected to help resolve defamation troubles of civil suits in Korea. In addition, when we think over our judgements by courts that have been upheld, suggesting some abstract contents of the requirements and exemption of illegality, the detailed legal theories of defamation in America are expected to help resolve several legal problems concerning requirements and privileges in the future.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. Libel과 Slander의 구별
Ⅲ. 명예훼손의 성립과 관련된 법적 검토
Ⅳ. 헌법상의 보호
Ⅴ. 면책사유
Ⅵ. 손해배상과 취소권
Ⅶ. Privacy 침해와의 관계
Ⅷ. 맺는말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 私法上의 團體와 憲法
- 미국 연방 민사소송규칙상의 전자적 자료의 증거개시에 관한 연구
- 名譽毁損의 민사적 법률관계
- 프로젝트 파이낸스(Project Finace)의 經濟的 主體와 讓許契約
- 비영리사단법인에 관한 독일의 최근 동향
- 인간배아줄기세포의 연구 규제와 불특허사유
- 정형화된 근로계약에서 무효인 위약금조항의 법률효과
- 미국 중재절차에서 집단분쟁의 해결
- 기업과 영업
- 전선절단사안에서의 불법행위책임에 관한 비교법적 연구
- 금융중개기관을 통해 간접보유하는 유가증권의 선의취득에 관한 연구
- 프랑스 민법상의 법인론
- 미국법상 약속적 금반언에 기한 전계약적 책임
- 응용미술품의 저작권법적인 보호
- 종교단체의 법인화
- 한-미 FTA 협정이 게임산업과 콘텐츠의 유통에 미치는 영향
- 주식명의신탁 과세연구
- 秘密維持契約에 관한 硏究
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!