루소의『에밀』에 대한 재해석

• 영문명: Reinterpretation of Rousseau's Émile
• 발행기관: 한국교육철학회
• 저자명: 강성훈(Kang Seong-Hun)
• 간행물 정보: 『교육철학』敎育哲學 第34集, 5~30쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.04.30

영문 초록

  In reading Rousseau"s thought, it is much influential that locates ？mile between Du Contrat Social and Discours sur l"origine et les fondements de l"in？galit？ parmi les hommes(OI). In other words, it means that regarding educational method of ？mile as rearing method of citizen makes the social contract. However this interpretation of ？mile and Rousseau"s thought makes an error. Because Rousseau regards religion as method of the social contract. In Rousseau"s thought, religion is the method for that resolves the discrepancy between the principle of "unconscious motive of human behaviour" and the principle which is "political legitimacy by collective rational behaviour (social contract)". It is differed education intending collective rational behaviour based on reason. In Rousseau"s system of thought, Du Contrat Social and ？mile presents separately the exclusive solution. The former constitution of a new government through the social contract, the later, when it is impossible, independent life. The educational method of ？mile is capable of it. In this view, It is possible to read correctly of another Rousseau"s educational works and his thought.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기 :『에밀』재해석의 필요성
Ⅱ. 에밀에 대한 대안적 독해
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

키워드

Rousseau Discours sur l"origine et les fondements de l"in？galit？ parmi les hommes ？mile Du Contrat Social religion education