학술논문
債權質權의 公示方法에 관한 小考
이용수 145
- 영문명
- Announcement Method of Pledge of Rights - Focusing on Impledging of Nominative Claim -
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 김병두(Byung-Du Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제13권 제4호, 263~304쪽, 전체 42쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.12.01
7,840원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Pledge right is the collateral developed for tangible assets, but after presentation of securities system that makes public recognition of property and independent exchange value of property right is recognized, pledge of rights targeting property right has occupied some portion of financial transactions. Impledging of nominative claim among property right is expressed as claim for return of rent deposit, deposit claim and claim for work payment. In actual transactions, however, financial institutions avoid impledging because of imperfectness of public announcement method of pledge right. In this regard, claim impledging fails to play a remarkable function compared to other pledge right targeting other property right. Difficult problems appear since legal principle of pledge right with transfer of occupation as requirement cannot be applied to the claims without public announcement as it is.
With regard to this, it is logical that right of claim is established with agreement of real right as semi-occupation of claim is recognized and principle of requirements for setting up against change of real right is adopted in Japan, however, it is required to have agreement on real objects in order to complement this since it makes disposition of pledge setter difficult and notice to or approval of the 3rd debtor was incomplete or insufficient as a requirements for setting up against it.
It is incomplete and non-exhaustive to adopt the alleviated object-requiring agreement as a method of setting claim impledging. In particular, it is more so in Korea which adopts principle of establishment requirement for change in real right. In the end, method of announcement as a requirement for claim pledge should be identified from separate grounds. If such method of announcement cannot be identified from the meaning of object-requirement agreement itself, the methods of announcement of claim impledging in Korean civil law is the transfer of semi-occupation of claim. Legal ground on this is found in the regulation of Article 355 of Civil Law.
However, even if we accept the concept of semi-occupation of claim, we cannot conclusively determine whether such semi-occupation can be accepted with which conditions. With regard to this, we can facilitate the safety of transactions since the claim registration system to be explained below may help to determine the period and existence of semi-occupation of claim. In addition, there is a time difference between the preparation of announcement method as a factor of establishment in reality and the preparation of announcement method as requirement for setting up against it. Pledge holder also worry that his pledge may be degraded to the subordinated order due to acquisition of pledge of the 3rd party for such period even if it is a short period. As a factor of harming the safety of transaction, claim pledge is not activated in actual transactions. This problem can be solved by introducing pledge registration system. In particular, registration of claim can be introduced to some financial claims such as claim right for return of rent deposit and credit trade receivables. Provided, however, that it may not be required to utilize claim registration system since bank system can manage the bank deposit claim even if claim registration is not performed as shown in the case of USA.
With regard to this, it is logical that right of claim is established with agreement of real right as semi-occupation of claim is recognized and principle of requirements for setting up against change of real right is adopted in Japan, however, it is required to have agreement on real objects in order to complement this since it makes disposition of pledge setter difficult and notice to or approval of the 3rd debtor was incomplete or insufficient as a requirements for setting up against it.
It is incomplete and non-exhaustive to adopt the alleviated object-requiring agreement as a method of setting claim impledging. In particular, it is more so in Korea which adopts principle of establishment requirement for change in real right. In the end, method of announcement as a requirement for claim pledge should be identified from separate grounds. If such method of announcement cannot be identified from the meaning of object-requirement agreement itself, the methods of announcement of claim impledging in Korean civil law is the transfer of semi-occupation of claim. Legal ground on this is found in the regulation of Article 355 of Civil Law.
However, even if we accept the concept of semi-occupation of claim, we cannot conclusively determine whether such semi-occupation can be accepted with which conditions. With regard to this, we can facilitate the safety of transactions since the claim registration system to be explained below may help to determine the period and existence of semi-occupation of claim. In addition, there is a time difference between the preparation of announcement method as a factor of establishment in reality and the preparation of announcement method as requirement for setting up against it. Pledge holder also worry that his pledge may be degraded to the subordinated order due to acquisition of pledge of the 3rd party for such period even if it is a short period. As a factor of harming the safety of transaction, claim pledge is not activated in actual transactions. This problem can be solved by introducing pledge registration system. In particular, registration of claim can be introduced to some financial claims such as claim right for return of rent deposit and credit trade receivables. Provided, however, that it may not be required to utilize claim registration system since bank system can manage the bank deposit claim even if claim registration is not performed as shown in the case of USA.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 현행 민법상 債權質權의 公示方法
Ⅲ. 민법개정안에서의 채권질권의 공시방법
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
Ⅱ. 현행 민법상 債權質權의 公示方法
Ⅲ. 민법개정안에서의 채권질권의 공시방법
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 학회활동현황(2006.10.1 - 2006.12.31) 외
- 債務不履行規範의 一元化를 위한 基礎 - 歷史의 桎梏을 넘어 私法의 世界化 경향과 조화할 것을 제안하며
- 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 사회적 책임투자(SRI)에 관한 고찰
- 일본의 성년후견제도의 개선 논의에 대한 동향
- 中國 會社法 改正에 대한 評價와 分析
- 外國人投資에 대한 國家安保上 規制
- 이중대표소송의 도입에 관한 고찰
- 不倫關係의 相對方에 대한 遺贈과 公序良俗
- UNCITRAL의 「담보거래에 관한 입법지침 초안」논의
- 경관이익의 법적 보호에 관한 연구 - 일본에서의 학설과 판례를 참조하여
- UNCITRAL 전자계약협약에 관한 비교법적 고찰과 전자거래기본법에의 영향
- 독일민법에 따른 취득시효의 중단사유 - 우리에게 주는 시사점
- DVD와 기술적 보호조치
- 공정거래법상 시장지배적 지위의 남용에 대한 합리적 규제방안
- 사업자단체의 부당공동행위
- 中國 商事立法方式의 選擇
- 판례평석 방법론에 관한 시론적 고찰 - 민사법 분야를 중심으로
- 債權質權의 公示方法에 관한 小考
- 미국 연방증권법상 ‘출자지분’(Equity Interests) - 소위 자본시장통합법상 ‘지분증권’ 개념과의 비교법적 검토
- 독일의 유한회사법 개정안(MoMiG법안)과 시사점
- 채혈 및 수혈 시 주의의무와 설명의무
- 한국의 통일과 토지소유제도의 재편
- 간행사
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!