학술논문
中國 會社法 改正에 대한 評價와 分析
이용수 56
- 영문명
- Evaluation and Analysis on the Revision of Chinese Corporate Law
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 조동제(Dong-Je Cho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제13권 제4호, 613~643쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.12.01
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The announcement and enforcement of the chinese corporate law became accomplished by the necessity of economic reform in 1993. The importance of chinese economic reform was the State-owend enterprise reform, and this state-owned enterprise reform brought up very important change of the chinese law system. Such the chinese corporate law is leading the common ownership system with its feature of remarkable common ownership systems and because of its standardized various corporate organization which coexists economic element its feature has very remarkable common ownership systems.
For example, among the features of incorporated company, it represents that it keeps the trace of the State-owend company which guarantees the right and interests of the workers who participated in the management of the Solely State-owend company. Because of the such law system"s past insufficient experience or existing law system has colors of high level official regulations, the corporate law legislation becomes to have the conservative colours.
Furthermore, it was difficult to satisfy the investment demands because of the too high threshold of the corporate establishment. Also the right and responsibility of the stockholders general meeting, board of directors, board of auditor and accounting was not clear because the corporate governance structure was irrational. And the protection system against the profit of the minority shareholder was insufficient. The regulation of the stocks issue, transfer and list already could not meet with the investment financing actual demands of the corporate, and the sincere duty and other legal responsibility of the high level official of the corporate such as the director and auditor and the regulation regarding the law responsibility was insufficient and It could not be satisfied the demands which protects the safe transactions and establishment of social trust systems. With this the chinese corporate law was behind in development of current social system and it can not follow in practice demand of the company and the enterprise.
Because about 10 years period of exclusion of the chinese corporate law corresponded to meet with the phased demand of the State-owned corporate system"s reform in the early legislation stage, the law structure internal system arrangement was not smooth. The basic direction of chinese corporate law reform should be establishment of the market order from above the foundation which lessens the government control. As we can view the 2005 chinese corporation law reform, corporate governing structure, corporate social liability, piercing the corporate veil, one-person corporation(subject to limited company), etc. new regulation and related criterion was introduced into the new corporate law. Against an existing corporate system and practical operation direction it improved and reinforced with very greatly.
Namely, lessens of the capital system, the improvement of corporate business operation, enhancement of the responsibility duty of the management level and strict demands of the stocked corporation"s system which realized criterion into the new corporate law became to meet with the demand of the operation of the corporate business organization. And with the introduction of these such law regulations, the space of corporate"s intention self-government became to be more wide and the regulations of the administration official regulation became to be reduced.
For example, among the features of incorporated company, it represents that it keeps the trace of the State-owend company which guarantees the right and interests of the workers who participated in the management of the Solely State-owend company. Because of the such law system"s past insufficient experience or existing law system has colors of high level official regulations, the corporate law legislation becomes to have the conservative colours.
Furthermore, it was difficult to satisfy the investment demands because of the too high threshold of the corporate establishment. Also the right and responsibility of the stockholders general meeting, board of directors, board of auditor and accounting was not clear because the corporate governance structure was irrational. And the protection system against the profit of the minority shareholder was insufficient. The regulation of the stocks issue, transfer and list already could not meet with the investment financing actual demands of the corporate, and the sincere duty and other legal responsibility of the high level official of the corporate such as the director and auditor and the regulation regarding the law responsibility was insufficient and It could not be satisfied the demands which protects the safe transactions and establishment of social trust systems. With this the chinese corporate law was behind in development of current social system and it can not follow in practice demand of the company and the enterprise.
Because about 10 years period of exclusion of the chinese corporate law corresponded to meet with the phased demand of the State-owned corporate system"s reform in the early legislation stage, the law structure internal system arrangement was not smooth. The basic direction of chinese corporate law reform should be establishment of the market order from above the foundation which lessens the government control. As we can view the 2005 chinese corporation law reform, corporate governing structure, corporate social liability, piercing the corporate veil, one-person corporation(subject to limited company), etc. new regulation and related criterion was introduced into the new corporate law. Against an existing corporate system and practical operation direction it improved and reinforced with very greatly.
Namely, lessens of the capital system, the improvement of corporate business operation, enhancement of the responsibility duty of the management level and strict demands of the stocked corporation"s system which realized criterion into the new corporate law became to meet with the demand of the operation of the corporate business organization. And with the introduction of these such law regulations, the space of corporate"s intention self-government became to be more wide and the regulations of the administration official regulation became to be reduced.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 中國 會社立法의 背景
Ⅲ. 中國 會社法 주요 改正內容 分析
Ⅳ. 結論
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
Ⅱ. 中國 會社立法의 背景
Ⅲ. 中國 會社法 주요 改正內容 分析
Ⅳ. 結論
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
키워드
국유기업
국유독자회사
회사지배구조
회사사회책임
회사법인격부인
1인회사
사외회사
관련거래
근로자대표대회
공산당조직
State-Owend Enterprise
Solely State-Owend Company
Corporate Governance Structure
Corporate Social Liability
Piercing the Corporate Veil
One-Person Corporation
Outside Director
Relevant Business
Congress of Workers and Staff
Structure of Communist Party
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 학회활동현황(2006.10.1 - 2006.12.31) 외
- 債務不履行規範의 一元化를 위한 基礎 - 歷史의 桎梏을 넘어 私法의 世界化 경향과 조화할 것을 제안하며
- 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 사회적 책임투자(SRI)에 관한 고찰
- 일본의 성년후견제도의 개선 논의에 대한 동향
- 中國 會社法 改正에 대한 評價와 分析
- 外國人投資에 대한 國家安保上 規制
- 이중대표소송의 도입에 관한 고찰
- 不倫關係의 相對方에 대한 遺贈과 公序良俗
- UNCITRAL의 「담보거래에 관한 입법지침 초안」논의
- 경관이익의 법적 보호에 관한 연구 - 일본에서의 학설과 판례를 참조하여
- UNCITRAL 전자계약협약에 관한 비교법적 고찰과 전자거래기본법에의 영향
- 독일민법에 따른 취득시효의 중단사유 - 우리에게 주는 시사점
- DVD와 기술적 보호조치
- 공정거래법상 시장지배적 지위의 남용에 대한 합리적 규제방안
- 사업자단체의 부당공동행위
- 中國 商事立法方式의 選擇
- 판례평석 방법론에 관한 시론적 고찰 - 민사법 분야를 중심으로
- 債權質權의 公示方法에 관한 小考
- 미국 연방증권법상 ‘출자지분’(Equity Interests) - 소위 자본시장통합법상 ‘지분증권’ 개념과의 비교법적 검토
- 독일의 유한회사법 개정안(MoMiG법안)과 시사점
- 채혈 및 수혈 시 주의의무와 설명의무
- 한국의 통일과 토지소유제도의 재편
- 간행사
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!