본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

取得時效에서의 占用權과 相當性

이용수 27

영문명
Possession Right and Significance in the Acquisitive Prescription
발행기관
한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
저자명
裵炳日(Byung-Il Bae)
간행물 정보
『비교사법』比較私法 제13권 제1호, 303~338쪽, 전체 36쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2006.03.01
7,120

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  According to the provision 245 of the Korean Civil Law, a person who has for twenty years peaceably and openly held possession of an immovable with an intention to own it, shall acquire the ownership by making registration thereof. In lawsuit practices concerning acquisitive prescription, one of the most critical issues is proving the autonomous possession. According to judicial precedents in the Korean Supreme Court, the other party of the acquisitive prescription, the owner, should assume the burden of proof for a possessor’s heteronomous possession. However, it is practically difficult, it is observed, for the owner to prove the possessor’s heteronomous possession. As such, in an effort to mitigate the other party’s burden of proof, the Korean Supreme Court suggests that the external and objective circumstances may be considered in such a case. As practical means of the external and objective circumstances, the Korean Supreme Court suggests a possession right theory and a theory base on significance (of the ratio of trespass area to ownership area). Although the possession right theory appears to be a good basis for the external and objective circumstances, it reveals a problem when the ratio of trespass area to ownership area is significantly large. In such a situation, it is reasonable to suppose that the possessor knowingly trespasses at the time of the initial purchase or initial possession of the property. Therefore, when the ratio of trespass area to ownership area is significant, it seems to be more appropriate to regard it as the possessor’s heteronomous possession. As such, it appears that the theory based on significance subsumes the possession right theory.

목차

Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
Ⅱ. 所有의 意思(自主占有)
Ⅲ. 占用權論
Ⅳ. 相當性論
Ⅴ. 結論
[참고문헌]
【ABSTRACT】

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

裵炳日(Byung-Il Bae). (2006).取得時效에서의 占用權과 相當性. 비교사법, 13 (1), 303-338

MLA

裵炳日(Byung-Il Bae). "取得時效에서의 占用權과 相當性." 비교사법, 13.1(2006): 303-338

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제