代案的 紛爭解決制度(ADR)의 經濟學 - 環境紛爭調停制度에 대한 評價를 中心으로

• 영문명: Economics of Alternative Dispute Resolution - Focusing on “Environmental Dispute Adjustment Act” -
• 발행기관: 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
• 저자명: 趙弘植(Hong-Sik Cho)
• 간행물 정보: 『비교사법』比較私法 제13권 제1호, 85~159쪽, 전체 75쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.03.01

영문 초록

  When individuals need to resolve their disputes with other individuals, they may often go not only to courts for trial but also to alternative methods of dispute resolution (“ADR”). Drawing upon a few recent studies, this article provides some economic explanation about why individuals make use of ADR instead of trial and/or settlement. By examining what the social interest is in ADR, it also provides a useful reference point by which one can evaluate the ADR system that the “Environmental Dispute Adjustment Act” has developed to cope with complicated environmental disputes.
  Part Ⅰ begins with defining the characteristics of environmental disputes that make environmental litigation less frequent. Due to the tendency of “under-litigation” involving environmental disputes, ADR is particularly needed for environmental disputes. An ADR system aiming at environmental disputes needs to be designed so as to i) minimize the total cost of resolving disputes, and simultaneously ii) to engage as many parties involved as possible and make an ideal communication structure where the parties involved can provide each other with the relevant information(Part Ⅱ). Part Ⅲ looks over the cost structure of ADR. The dispute resolution costs of ADR consist of ADR-using cost(“operation cost”) and misjudgment cost(“error cost”). To save the former, it is necessary to trade off the latter. Accordingly, an ideal ADR system must be such that the sum of both can be minimized. In general, ADR brings about less operation costs than a trial before the courts. Therefore the success of ADR depends upon how much it can minimize error costs. If one can design an ideal communication structure in ADR process, it may also help lower error costs. Part Ⅳ specifies ADR"s institutional elements necessary to cope successfully with environmental disputes. Drawing upon the findings of Part Ⅲ and Ⅳ, Part Ⅴ evaluates the current ADR system established by the Environmental Dispute Adjustment Act.

목차

序論
Ⅰ. 민사소송의 경제학
Ⅱ. 환경분쟁의 특징과 ADR 도입의 필요성
Ⅲ. ADR의 경제학: ADR에 대한 분석적 평가
Ⅳ. 환경분쟁해결을 위한 ADR의 제도적 요소 및 그 제약요소
Ⅴ. 환경분쟁과 관련한 현행 ADR의 현황 및 문제점
結論
[참고문헌]
【ABSTRACT】

키워드

환경 환경분쟁 환경소송 대안적 분쟁해결제도 화해 ADR 행정형 ADR 법원형 ADR 알선 조정 중재 법경제학 경제학적 방법론 환경분쟁조정 환경분쟁조정위원회 사전적유인 효율성 분쟁해결비용 운용환경 환경분쟁 환경소송 대안적 분쟁해결제도 화해 ADR 행정형 ADR 법원형 ADR 알선 조정 중재 법경제학 경제학적 방법론 환경분쟁조정 환경분쟁조정위원회 사전적유인 효율성 분쟁해결비용 운용비용 오판비용 의사소통 사회적 비용 사회적 편익 사회적 효율성 위험중립적 소송유형 법정책 과소소송 과다소송 외부효과 정치적 외부효과 교섭력 협상력 재산권 코오즈 정리 집합행위 위험 리스크 공공선택 정치실패 법원의 역할 구제에서 조정으로 억지효과 ex ante 행위유인 인센티브 사회후생 자치 재판청구권 공법적 한계 중립성 독립성 공정성 신중성 environmental dispute law and economics environmental dispute adjustment total cost of resolving disputes operation cost error cost communication structure legal policy coase theorem