학술논문
한국사회의 청렴성 제고를 위한 헌법적 고찰 - 공직사회의 부패방지 문제를 중심으로
이용수 355
- 영문명
- A Constitutional Study on the promotion of probity of the Korean society
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 김상겸(Kim Sang-Kyum)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第12卷 第2號, 249~280쪽, 전체 32쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.06.01
6,640원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
A state"s probity is premised on strong morality. However, considering the side-effects which corruption causes, probity cannot be achieved through the mere ethical awareness of the public officials. In order to eradicate corruption, efficient and effective laws and institutions should be arranged. To resolve the corruption problem which impairs the state probity, public officials need to clearly recognize that corruption collapses the constitutional order of value which contains human basic rights, democracy, constitutionalism and social justice. Therefore, it is a national agenda to eradicate corruption and promote probity and thus creating a constitutional order of value.
There has been various laws and institutions prevailing, but they had limitations in that they did not approach the corruption matter in this point of view. A state"s probity has become a crucial factor in determining the status in the international society, and also a measure of the possibility of its development potentials. The Korean society also recognized this and enacted "the Corruption Prevention Act”, the general law for prevention of corruption. And further at July 2005, the former "Board of corruption prevention" made a new start as "Committee of National probity" with a strong will to stand the state inter-domestically on a moral basis, breaking from the passive prevention of corruption. However, its organization and authority is still weak to reach the goal of efficient and systematical prevention of corruption.
To prevent corruption and promote probity, all the works related to corruption prevention should be integrated into one organization, and to reach the goal efficiently, other suggestions such as granting the organization substantial authority like investigation rights should be actively discussed. Of course, as mentioned before, these arrangements of legal institutions are basically needed in eradicating the social factors of corruption culture and this can be promoted through systematical anti-corruption education.
In addition, the international?domestic restriction system should actually function and the arrangements of the overall system in which citizens take part can contribute to this. Also systematic self-censorship within public service should also be arranged, thus making the public officials be the ones responsible for the corruption prevention. The corruption problem is especially serious in Korean society because it is a kind of culture which is formed through long-term customs and unjust ideas. Therefore, eradicating the basic factors forming corruption culture is indeed the shortest way to prevent corruption and ultimately to promote the probity of a state.
There has been various laws and institutions prevailing, but they had limitations in that they did not approach the corruption matter in this point of view. A state"s probity has become a crucial factor in determining the status in the international society, and also a measure of the possibility of its development potentials. The Korean society also recognized this and enacted "the Corruption Prevention Act”, the general law for prevention of corruption. And further at July 2005, the former "Board of corruption prevention" made a new start as "Committee of National probity" with a strong will to stand the state inter-domestically on a moral basis, breaking from the passive prevention of corruption. However, its organization and authority is still weak to reach the goal of efficient and systematical prevention of corruption.
To prevent corruption and promote probity, all the works related to corruption prevention should be integrated into one organization, and to reach the goal efficiently, other suggestions such as granting the organization substantial authority like investigation rights should be actively discussed. Of course, as mentioned before, these arrangements of legal institutions are basically needed in eradicating the social factors of corruption culture and this can be promoted through systematical anti-corruption education.
In addition, the international?domestic restriction system should actually function and the arrangements of the overall system in which citizens take part can contribute to this. Also systematic self-censorship within public service should also be arranged, thus making the public officials be the ones responsible for the corruption prevention. The corruption problem is especially serious in Korean society because it is a kind of culture which is formed through long-term customs and unjust ideas. Therefore, eradicating the basic factors forming corruption culture is indeed the shortest way to prevent corruption and ultimately to promote the probity of a state.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 한국사회의 부패문화와 헌법국가의 과제로써 국가청렴의 확보
Ⅲ. 국가 청렴성 제고를 위한 관련 법제 개관
Ⅳ. 국가 청렴성 제고를 위한 방안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. 한국사회의 부패문화와 헌법국가의 과제로써 국가청렴의 확보
Ⅲ. 국가 청렴성 제고를 위한 관련 법제 개관
Ⅳ. 국가 청렴성 제고를 위한 방안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 한국사회의 청렴성 제고를 위한 헌법적 고찰 - 공직사회의 부패방지 문제를 중심으로
- 〈헌법개정연구 제4분과위원회〉 : 사법제도 관련 헌법규정의 개정 논의
- 헌법과 한국 민주주의: 1987년 헌정체제를 중심으로
- 性的 自己決定權의 憲法上 導出根據에 관한 批判的 檢討
- 금융보험사 보유 계열사 주식의 의결권 축소ㆍ제한의 위헌성 문제
- 〈헌법개정연구 제1분과위원회〉 : 제3조(영토조항)와 제4조(통일조항)
- 헌법재판의 법적 성격 - 헌법재판소의 논증도구인 비례성원칙과 평등원칙을 예로
- 미국헌법상 명백하고 현존하는 위험 원칙
- 위헌법률심판에서 심판의 기준
- 〈헌법개정연구 제1분과위원회〉 : 재정ㆍ경제 조항
- 〈헌법개정연구 제2분과위원회〉 : 기본권의 개정방향과 구체적 검토
- 〈헌법개정연구 제3분과위원회〉 : 국가권력구조의 개편방향
- 발간사
- 社團法人 韓國憲法學會 定款 외
- 憲法上 行政腐敗에 관한 硏究
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!