학술논문
혼인계약에서의 효과의사
이용수 13
- 영문명
- The Transaction Intention in Marriage Contract- Korean Supreme Court Decision 2010Meu574 Decided June 10, 2010 -
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 박영목(Park, Young-Mok)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제51호, 49~84쪽, 전체 36쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.12.31
7,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Korean Supreme Court in its judgment of 10, June 2010(2010Meu574) decided that the marriage between Korean man and Philippine woman is null and void because there was no agreement to marry between the two parties (Article 815 subparagraph 1 of the Korean Civil Code). Namely the Korean Supreme Court made the decision that the Philippine woman have had no intention to get married. This decision can be explained by the theory of declaration of untrue intention. But it is different from earlier decisions of Korean Supreme Court about declaration of untrue intention. In earlier cases Korean Supreme Court divided the intention about legal effect and one about economic effect. In addition, the Supreme Court distinguished a true desire from its intention. In this respect, if the declarant does not want the economic effect by that declaration or wants another economic effect, the declaration is not the one of untrue intention. The same is true of the true desire. Even thou declarant doesn t want the legal effect by that declaration, but if she or he accepts the legal effect, so she or he has the intention. In this case, Philippine woman has got married because she has wanted the economic promotion. However, its purpose is just related with economic effects. Thus, it can t influence on the validity of declaration. In addition, the Philippine woman is not really eager to get married but she accepts the legal effects of marriage. In this respect, she had the intention, and thus the marriage cannot be avoided. Of course she lived just one month with her husband and then left home. And the Korean Supreme Court may presume that she did not agree the sexual relation. However this author argues that it can be just a reason of divorce, not but void and null of a marriage.
목차
Ⅰ. 대상판결의 검토
Ⅱ. 문제의 제기
Ⅲ. 판례에 따른 효과의사의 개념정의
Ⅳ. 대상판결에의 적용
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- 장애인재활상담사 보수교육 운영에 관한 인식 연구: 재활관련 기관 종사자 FGI를 기반으로
- 장애인재활상담사의 직무요인과 상담 전문성, 자기효능감이 심리적 소진에 미치는 영향
- 발달장애 근로 청년의 1인 가구 자립생활 지원 욕구에 관한 연구: 장애 당사자⋅보호자⋅지원인력을 중심으로
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!