의과대학생들의 소그룹 발표에 대한 동료평가의 의의

• 영문명: Peer assessment of small-group presentations by medical students and its implications
• 발행기관: 한국의학교육학회
• 저자명: 유선미(Sunmi Yoo) 이가영(Kayoung Lee) 이상헌(Sang Heon Lee) 노혜린(HyeRin Roh) 이종태(Jong Tae Lee) 이병두(Byoung Doo
• 간행물 정보: 『Korean Journal of Medical Education』제26권 제1호, 31~40쪽, 전체 10쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.03.31

영문 초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among medical students’ assessments on peers’ group presentations, instructors’ assessments of those presentations, and students’ educational achievements in other assignments and tests. Methods: A total of 101 first-year students from a medical school participated in the study. The students’ educational achievements in a 4-week long integrated curriculum were analyzed. Student’s final grades were comprised of the following education criteria: two written tests (60%), 15 group reports (25%), one individual report (7%), and four group presentations (15%). We compared scores of the group presentation assessed by the peers and the two instructors. Furthermore, we compared peers’ assessment scores with each component of the evaluation criteria. Results: Pearson correlation analysis showed significant correlaton for the assessments between peers and instructors (r=0.775, p<0.001). Peer assessment scores also correlated significantly with scores for the group assignments (r=0.777, p<0.001), final grades on the curriculum (r=0.345, p<0.001), and scores for individual assignments (r=0.334, p<0.001); however, no significant correlation was observed between the peer-assessed group presentation scores and the two written test scores. Conclusion: Peer assessments may be a reliable and valid method for evaluating medical students’ performances in an integrated curriculum, especially if the assessments are used to academic processes, such as presentations, with explicit evaluation and judgment criteria. Peer assessments on group presentations might assess different learning domains compared to written tests that primarily evaluate limited medical knowledge and clinical reasoning.

목차

서론

대상 및 방법

결과

고찰

REFERENCES

키워드

Peer review Self-evaluation programs Teaching Group processes