真值语义相同下的“才”和“就”之比较

• 발행기관: 중국인문학회
• 저자명: 王晓光 孙多玉
• 간행물 정보: 『중국인문과학 』제65집, 213~223쪽, 전체 11쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.04.30

영문 초록

“cai(才)”and“jiu(就)”,both of them are adverbs that have meaning of emphasis. But even in the same meaning of truth value, their direction, range, meaning are not the same. “cai(才)”has a clear meaning of reverse converse. On the contrary, “jiu(就)”has a meaning of positive definite. When teaching Chinese to nonnative students ,“cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” are one of the common obstacle making it difficult for them to understand chinese grammars. Being a kind of expletive that don’t have any concrete meaning, only having functional meaning, “caiconfusion easily.” and “jiu(就)” can make the students learning chinese confusion easily. Their position and function in the sentence is the same, so students make errors repeatedly. Thus there are no little comparative studies of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)”. But there are only a few studies about their basic color of emotion, grammatical meaning, and derivative uses. I hope, this study will be able to help the students to understand differences between “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)”. This essay is the comparative study of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” in the same meaning of truth value in the reductive context way.

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. “才”和“就”与时间名词的搭配

Ⅲ. “才”和“就”与数量词的搭配

Ⅳ. 条件复句下的“才”和“就”

Ⅴ. 其他句子中的“才”与“就”

Ⅵ. 结语

키워드

Turth-value Semantics Cai Jiu emphasize Reverse Converse Positive Definite Reductive Context 才 就