韩国学界对日帝时期“满鲜史观”“满洲史观”的批判硏究

• 영문명: Criticism of the Korean Academic on the “Man Xian's View of History(满鲜史观)” and “Manchurian View of History(满洲史观)” during the Japanese Occupation Period: Focused on Research of Early 21st Century
• 발행기관: 중앙대학교 중앙사학연구소
• 저자명: 廉松心(Lian Songxin) 유지원(Yu Ji-Won)
• 간행물 정보: 『중앙사론』제57집, 111~142쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.12.30

국문 초록

韩国学界称日帝时期的朝鲜史、“满洲史”研究称为“殖民史学”，通常以他律性论、停滞性论、日鲜同祖论等规定其特征。“满鲜史观”“满洲史观”的他律性历史认识的一种。韩国学界对“殖民史学”的批判始于20世纪60年代，到21世纪，特别是中国出现东北边疆研究热之后，“满鲜史观”“满洲史观”再次成 为韩国历史学界关注的焦点，学者们围绕“满鲜史观”对古朝鲜、高句丽、渤海史研究进行一系列的批判，白鸟库吉、稻叶岩吉等“东洋史”学者们出于日本向朝鲜和中国东北地区的侵略扩张和殖民统治需要而提出的“满鲜不可分论”、“满蒙非中国论”、“日满不可分关系论”成为主要批判对象。同时出现了要反思以往对“殖民史学”批判研究存在的问题和民族主义史学的局限性，重构韩国古代史体系的主张。寻求解决东亚历史归属问题有效途径的关键是避免将历史问题现实化、将领土问题历史化，尽可能将历史学研究纳入纯粹学术研究范围，通过实事求是的科学研究，还原历史真面目，共享东亚各民族的历史遗产。

영문 초록

The Korean academic call the study of Korean history and “Manchurian history” during the Japanese Emperor period “colonialist history”, which is usually characterized by the theory of heteronomy, stagnancy, the theory of Japan's common ancestor, and the “Manchurian view of history”. The Korean academic began to criticize colonial historiography in the 1960s. After the Northeast Frontier Research Fever appeared in China in the early 21st century, the “Man Xian’s View of History” became the focus of the Korean academic. A series of critical studies focused on the “Man Xian’s View of History” of ancient Korean history, Gao Gou Li history, and Bohai history. These studies mainly expose and criticize theories such as “inseparable theory of Manchurian-Korea”, “non China theory of Manchuria and Mongolia”, and “inseparable relationship between Manchuria and Japan”, which are carried out by Japanese scholars like Shirikuki and Inaba Yanji for the needs of the Japanese Empire's invasion and expansion to Korea and China and its colonial rule. There has been another proposal to rethink the problems and limitations in “colonial history research”, and to reconstruct the ancient Korean history system. The key to finding an effective method to solve the East Asian history ownership problem is to avoid equalizing historical problems with contemporary reality, to avoid equalizing territorial problems with history. Historical studies should be considered purely academical and historical facts should be restored by “seeking truth from facts”.

목차

Ⅰ. 绪论

Ⅱ. 对“满鲜史观”“满洲史观”的批判

Ⅲ. 对“殖民史学”批判与民族主义史学的反思

Ⅳ. 结论

키워드

殖民史学 满鲜史观 满鲜不可分论 满蒙非中国论 日满不可分关系 Colonial Historiography Man Xian's View of History The theory of Inseparable of Manchurian-Korea The non china theory of Manchuria and Mongolia The Inseparable Re-lationship between Manchuria and Japan