학술논문
국민참여재판에서의 실질적 직접심리주의 구현
이용수 26
- 영문명
- The realization of the principle of practical direct examination in participatory trials
- 발행기관
- 한국형사판례연구회
- 저자명
- 한제희(Han, Je-hee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사판례연구』제30권, 465~514쪽, 전체 50쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2022.06.30
8,800원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The target judgment held that the appeals court should not arbitrarily overrule the judgment of the first instance based on the unanimous verdict of the jury, unless sufficient and convincing circumstances to the contrary clearly emerged through the examination of new evidence. The reason that the appellate court held that the judgment of the first instance should be respected is that the judgment of the first instance was the result of the jury's judgment based on the principle of practical direct examination. As such, the conclusion of a participatory trial is an authoritative decision that is respected by the appeals court and cannot be overturned.
However, the fact that the reality of our participatory trials is quite different from these expectations can be confirmed from the cases of participatory trials cited in this article. In fact, there are a number of cases in which the current participatory trial is somewhat far from the principle of practical direct examination, which is conducted in a written trial like general trials.
If this phenomenon is due to the realistic circumstances of the limitation of judicial resources, solving these realistic problems should be the first, and the ultimate improvement plan is to finish the trial implementation for more than 10 years and re-establish a complete trial system.
Next, putting these legislative and administrative improvements aside, a realistic alternative that can be considered within the framework of the current system is to acknowledge the current reality of a one-day trial and to acknowledge the unavoidable written trial practice due to a one-day trial. And in terms of selection and concentration, it is necessary to limit the scope so that only a very small number of cases in which the case is serious and the accused denies the charges are subject to the participatory trial.
In addition, in the era of digitalization of criminal justice procedures starting from the end of 2024, it is necessary to prepare for witnesses of investigators, investigation of evidence for audio or video recordings, and video trials in participatory trials. As a result, although it is a reality that harms the authority of participatory trials, the current high appeal rate is inevitable given the characteristics of our system, which is quite different from the US jury system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국민참여재판 사례 검토
Ⅲ. 국민참여재판과 실질적 직접심리주의의 관계
Ⅳ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 피해자의 자손행위를 이용한 간접정범의 인정여부
- 방조범의 인과관계
- 정당한 이유없이 출입을 금지당한 공동거주자가 공동생활의 장소에 들어간 경우 주거침입죄의 성립여부
- 국민참여재판에서의 실질적 직접심리주의 구현
- 2021년도 형법판례 회고
- 2021년도 형사소송법 판례 회고
- 정당행위에 대한 대법원 판단기준과 법이론적 분석
- 이탈과 중지미수, 그리고 인과성
- 임용권 행사와 직권남용권리행사방해죄
- 직권남용과 성폭력 2차가해
- 사실 적시 명예훼손죄와 표현의 자유
- 강간죄에서 법원의 피해자 동의에 대한 해석 권한
- 주거침입의 보호법익과 침입의 태양
- 가상자산의 착오이체와 배임죄
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!