본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

이혼시 퇴직연금 재산분할의 집행법적 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 소고

이용수 11

영문명
A Study on the Civil Enforcement of Equitable Distribution of Future Pension Rights upon Divorce
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
박지원(Park, Ji Won)
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제18권 제2호, 321~360쪽, 전체 40쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2014.11.30
7,600

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

It has been recognized that retirement pension rights are the second most valuable financial resource in a marriage after the real estate, such as family home. When the marriage is getting worse, it is up to the family court to decide whether and how joint assets, including pension rights, are divided. Before July 2014, the Supreme Court has continuously denied to divide future pension rights. However, in July 2014, in a divorce action between public official and his housewife, the entire bench of Supreme Court changed its own view en banc by allowing division of future pension rights, whether vested or not. And the Court determined the method of division that pension recipient pay to the other spouse a certain proportion of the pension payment at a regular interval is also possible. However, the spouse other than recipient may experience difficulties, if the recipient do not fulfill his obligation voluntarily. If the recipient fails to pay annuity without just cause, the family court may order performance under Art. 64 of the Family Litigation Act. This order is indirect remedy in nature, because only fine or detention is available. Direct remedy of seizure and assignment order is not availble at this moment, because every public Pension Acts have a provision against assignment and seizure. In 1974, the U.S. Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in order to prevent the seizure of retirement plan. On the contrary, several states continued to give equitable distribution. The conflict make the Congress legislate the Retirement Equity Act of 1984, creating Qualified Domestic Relations Order(QDRO). Once QDRO is entered by the state court, the non-employee spouse can be paid directly from the pension provider. In U.K., since 1 December 2000, the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999 has allowed a couple on divorce the option of pension sharing and the court can grant a pension sharing order against the members pension rights in a pension arrangement. The pension sharing order will create a separate pension arrangement in the name of the former spouse. Both U.S. and U.K. legislation can be good examples of direct remedy for the procedural difficulties of pension division. Hence next step should be taken by the National Assembly to make the pension division upon divorce possible both substantively and procedurally.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 2014. 7. 16. 선고 전원합의체 판결과 집행의 한계
Ⅲ. 영·미 입법례 및 개선방안의 검토
Ⅳ. 마치며
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박지원(Park, Ji Won). (2014).이혼시 퇴직연금 재산분할의 집행법적 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 소고. 민사소송, 18 (2), 321-360

MLA

박지원(Park, Ji Won). "이혼시 퇴직연금 재산분할의 집행법적 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 소고." 민사소송, 18.2(2014): 321-360

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제