학술논문
판결서의 증명력
이용수 4
- 영문명
- PROBATIVE FORCE OF WRITTEN JUDGEMENTS AS EVIDENCE
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 이태영(Lee Taeyoung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제16권 제2호, 217~257쪽, 전체 41쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.11.30
7,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
A final judgment has res judicata effect only upon claims addressed by its dispositions but has no res judicata effect upon reasoning for the judgment. If the extent of res judicata effect is limited to claims included in dispositions of a judgment, it is impossible to avoid repeated relitigation based on the same facts in dispute, and distrust of the judiciary may be caused by inconsistent judgments on a prior claim and subsequent claims. Concerned over such problems, theoretical attempts have been continuously made to recognize the binding effect on reasoning for judgement. In connection with this problem, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea has accepted a written judgment as a written report presented to prove the facts accepted in the judgment and tends to recognize a strong probative force of a written judgment as evidence with regard to facts accepted in a final judgment. However, the tendency of such precedents involve many problems. Among facts accepted in a judgment, there are not only facts contested by parties and proved by evidence but also facts established by allocation of burden of proof or constructive admission, and thus it is necessary to separate such cases where facts are established by evidence from cases where facts are established by allocation of burden of proof or constructive admission. Since fact-finding in judgment has a nature of legal ruling, it is hard to accept a judgment as a report of facts. In addition, it is difficult to recognize the probative force of a written judgment as evidence in light of the structure of litigation or civil proceedings. Furthermore, a problem that the above-mentioned attitude towards precedents actually violates the principle of immediacy arises, since a written judgment is presented as evidence in a subsequent suit for trial with respect to matters already determined by the prior judgment. The res judicata effect affects only parties to a lawsuit. However, if the probative force of written judgments as evidence is recognized, it results in recognizing the binding effect of judgment on a prior lawsuit to third parties, who were non-parties, and thus it is likely to debilitate the principle of relativity of res judicata effect. Considering such problems, it is necessary to review the attitude of cases that recognize the probative force of written judgments as evidence and to pro-actively examine the collateral estoppel doctrine that Japan has adopted.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 판결이유 중의 판단의 구속력
Ⅲ. 판결서의 증명력에 관한 대법원 판례의 태도
Ⅳ. 검토
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미국연방지방법원 부판사제를 활용한 우리 법관임용시스템의 개선방안
- 확정판결에 기한 부동산이중매매와 진정명의회복을 원인으로 한 소유권이전등기소송
- 독일법의 증명책임과 증명경감론의 전개와 동향
- 판결서의 증명력
- 한·중·일 증거조사 공조시스템의 구축 방안
- 다수당사자소송의 발전과 전망 – 이른바 공익소송을 중심으로
- 법정지법의 적용에 있어서 절차와 실체의 구분
- 소송법률관계에 대한 예비적 공동소송313
- 민법상 조합의 당사자능력에 관한 고찰
- 2012년 독일 조정법의 내용과 평가
- 기자의 취재원 보호와 증언거부권
- 민사소송법상의 신의성실원칙의 제도구축과 사법운용
- 2012년 제15차 세계민사소송법대회 (IAPL) 참가보고
- 刊行辭
- 2012년 제4차 한중 민사소송법 학술대회 참가보고
- 민사소송법 제70조 소정의 예비적·선택적 공동소송의 요건
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!