학술논문
미국연방지방법원 부판사제를 활용한 우리 법관임용시스템의 개선방안
이용수 6
- 영문명
- A study on magistrate judge selection system in reference to Korea and U.S. Federal District Court
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 함영주(Young joo Ham)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제16권 제2호, 455~493쪽, 전체 39쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.11.30
7,480원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
When the Korea law school system was introduced in 2008, the Supreme Court of Korea had a plan to new judge appointing systems. The plan is now expected to shake the foundation of the national judiciary system,in which top scorers of the examination have managed to earn the appointment right after they have completed their twoyear mandatory educational program at the Judicial Research and Training Institute. According to the reform plan submitted to parliament, those with more than three years of experience as prosecutor, lawyer, law professor or others will be able to be hired as a judge in 2013. The career qualification will be tightened to more than five years at such jobs from 2018 to 2019 and more than seven years of experience could be hired judges from 2020 to 2021. From 2022,only those with more than 10 years of field experiences will be hired as judge. Apart from prerequisites of these field experiences, I would rather try to investigate how to recruit new judges actually and what process is exactly needed. That s because longer years of field experience does not guarantee good judges. For this background, I am trying to investigate U.S. Federal magistrate judge s selection and evaluation system and try to apply the system into Korea judge appointing system. A magistrate judge s appointment is subject to a budget of Korea supreme court by the legislature s allowances. The vacancy is advertised that all the lawyers in the area of the court could have the opportunity to apply for the position. A news release is made to newspapers and broadcasting media in the district. After applications are received, magistrates selection panels determine the competence and experience qualifications which are the most important in selecting a magistrate judge. Standard form of questionnaires are distributed to each lawyer in the area, trying to assess applicant s qualifications. Prior to interviewing any applicants, background checks are made by the court and the results communicated to the court administrator who distributes the information to magistrate panels. Magistrates panels adopt are subject to standards of fairness, equal opportunity, and merit selection. The panel decides the method of voting in advance. The panel interview questions and each applicant should be asked questions so that the magistrate panel could compare the applicant s qualifications. Results of the appraisals are communicated by the magistrate panel through the court administrator to the individual judge. Results of the judicial appraisal remain absolutely confidential. This kind of magistrate judge selection system could also appropriate to get rid of the lawyer s privilege of his/her former judge post and to lower the barrier of justice for the common people.
목차
Ⅰ. 논의의 필요성
Ⅱ. 미국 연방지방법원 부판사제도
Ⅲ. 우리의 법관임용방식과 미국연방법원 부판사의 임명절차에서 얻을 수 있는 교훈
Ⅳ. 결어
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미국연방지방법원 부판사제를 활용한 우리 법관임용시스템의 개선방안
- 확정판결에 기한 부동산이중매매와 진정명의회복을 원인으로 한 소유권이전등기소송
- 독일법의 증명책임과 증명경감론의 전개와 동향
- 판결서의 증명력
- 한·중·일 증거조사 공조시스템의 구축 방안
- 다수당사자소송의 발전과 전망 – 이른바 공익소송을 중심으로
- 법정지법의 적용에 있어서 절차와 실체의 구분
- 소송법률관계에 대한 예비적 공동소송313
- 민법상 조합의 당사자능력에 관한 고찰
- 2012년 독일 조정법의 내용과 평가
- 기자의 취재원 보호와 증언거부권
- 민사소송법상의 신의성실원칙의 제도구축과 사법운용
- 2012년 제15차 세계민사소송법대회 (IAPL) 참가보고
- 刊行辭
- 2012년 제4차 한중 민사소송법 학술대회 참가보고
- 민사소송법 제70조 소정의 예비적·선택적 공동소송의 요건
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!