본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

해방 후 국어학계의 분열과 대립

이용수 60

영문명
Language Nationalism and Scientific Linguistic after the Liberation
발행기관
한국근현대사학회
저자명
李俊植(Lee, Jun-sik)
간행물 정보
『한국근현대사연구』제67집, 88~118쪽, 전체 31쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2013.12.30
6,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This article is to explain how the divisions between language nationalists and scientific linguists during Japan colonial period were carried over the language policy and leadership competition in the academia of Korean language after the liberation. After the liberation, the two had been shown to coexist for a short term even though they had a different set of values for language. However, it did not last long. They had distinctly different stances for the language, ethnic groups or relationship between language and society. Therefore Both sides started to struggled for the leadership in the education and study for the korean after that. An acute their conflict started, to make matters worse, it is not over yet and hold out in any sense still. The language nationalists, who were carrying on the hangul movement that began by Ju, Si kyung, recognized that the here and hereafter of the country prosperity depends on keeping and elaborating Hangul. So they would be trying to actively involve in real national linguistic life. They tried to set the language standard and loanword orthography. For those reasons, they got into the government agencies and took charge of language policy. They made some turning point of which korean got out of antecedent chinese language area by achieving the exclusive usage of Hangul and horizontal writing of it. Contrastively, the scientific linguists, who majored in Chosŏn Language and Literature under Japanese scholars at Kyŏngsŏng Imperial University, did not agree with language nationalists. They denied a normative law of languages, which is a different view point from language nationalists’. They strenuously insisted that the linguistic should not intervene into real language life at all. Whenever they criticized the language nationalism, they claimed to stand for science. To put it simply, the core of variances was on how the relationship between linguistic and practical language set. They split into two factions by choosing whether they had to involve in setting language standard through ‘the Hangul movement’ or leave it as it is because language simply should be an object of study. By the way, the science which scientific linguistics used was merely a showy word for the sense of superiority from Kyŏngsŏng Imperial University graduate. They used it to non Kyongsong Imperial University graduate in order to show that they held prominent positions. Those kinds of fancy words are being reproduced constantly by the graduates from Korean language and literature Korean language education at Seoul National University, which is connected to Chosŏn Language and Literature at Kyŏngg Imperial University

목차

1. 머리말
2. 해방 이전 언어민족주의와 과학적 언어학의 흐름
3. 해방정국기 언어민족주의와 과학적 언어학의 불안한 동거
4. 언어민족주의와 과학적 언어학의 대립
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

李俊植(Lee, Jun-sik). (2013).해방 후 국어학계의 분열과 대립. 한국근현대사연구, 67 , 88-118

MLA

李俊植(Lee, Jun-sik). "해방 후 국어학계의 분열과 대립." 한국근현대사연구, 67.(2013): 88-118

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제