중재판정부의 임시적 처분과 국제중재기관들의 긴급중재인 제도 비교 연구

• 영문명: A Comparative Study on the Interim Measures of Protection and the Emergency Arbitrator Systems of International Arbitration Institutions
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 주이화 배상필 심상렬
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제22권 제3호, 215~238쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.12.30

영문 초록

This paper is to review the interim measures of arbitral tribunals in international commercial arbitration and to compare the emergency arbitrator systems of international arbitration institutions including the ICDR, SCC, SIAC, ACICA, and ICC. Most arbitration legislation and arbitration rules permit the arbitral tribunal to grant orders for interim measures of protection. Orders for interim measures by the arbitral tribunal are not self-enforcing. However, the revised articles with regard to interim measures of UNCITRAL Model Law of 2006 are regarded to contribute significantly to the effectiveness of interim measures in international commercial arbitration. A party that needs urgent interim or conservatory measures that cannot await the constitution of an arbitral tribunal may make an application for such measures. Major international arbitration institutions have their own rules and provisions for the emergency arbitrator system, which was set forth first by the ICRD in 2006. The application requirements for emergency arbitrators are almost the same. However, there are significant differences in details such as appointments and applications for challenging emergency arbitrators, the process and form of the emergency arbitrator s decision, etc. Therefore, it will be necessary to consider these differences for more desirable emergency arbitrator proceedings in Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 임시적 처분의 권한 및 집행 가능성

Ⅲ. 국제중재기관의 긴급중재인 제도 비교

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

임시적 처분 임시보전처분 긴급중재인 제도 상사중재 국제중재기관 Interim Measures of Protection Emergency Arbitrator Commercial Arbitration International Arbitration Institutions ICDR SCC SIAC ACICA ICC