본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

‘변형적 점령’과 국제점령법의 적용

이용수 263

영문명
Transformative Occupation and the Application of International Law of Occupation
발행기관
국제법평론회
저자명
안준형(Ahn, Jun Hyeong)
간행물 정보
『국제법평론』제51호, 95~128쪽, 전체 34쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2018.10.30
6,880

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Until the 19th century, ‘occupation’ made it possible to immediately acquire all the titles of the region by excluding the sovereignty of the territory. Until the medieval period, occupation was synonymous with ‘conquest’ or ‘exploitation’. Thus, the transfer of sovereignty through occupation included not only the territory and the public property of the country, but also all private property. However, as political and ideological changes such as the principle of balance of power, humanitarian ideology, the development of modern military organizations, and emergence of nation states, etc. appeared in the nineteenth century, the concept of traditional occupation in the same sense as conquest gradually disappeared, and the concept of occupation based on the idea of ‘t emporary control’ on the occupied territories became firmly established. Thus, ① temporality of occupation, ② the principle of the inalienability of sovereignty through sheer force, and ③ the ‘conservationist principle’ based on preservation of status quo ante in the territory were regarded as core principles of International Law of Occupation. However, the occupation of Iraq in 2003 brought a chance to trigger a debate on whether to provide adequate function as a normative framework that governs the rights and obligations of the occupant with the existing International Law of Occupation. The ‘transformative occupation that emerged in 2003 with the occupation of Iraq is that the conservationist principle, which forms the core of the International Law of Occupation, no longer meets the demands of the times, which was linked to the argument that an alternative legal system reflecting state practice should be sought. However, the existence of the occupation is not a matter of law but merely a matter of fact. No matter how denied the status of occupying power, the effectiveness of the International Law of Occupation cannot be denied in that it is enough to establish ‘effective control’ by the occupying power. Of course, it cannot be denied that recent occupation patterns have been unusual circumstances that were not envisioned at the time of the adoption of the Hague Regulations of 1907. Nevertheless, as long as the effective control test of Article 42 of the Hague Regulations of 1907 are met, the occupying power should still be seen as being bound by the International Law of Occupation.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 국제점령법의 역사적 발전과그 핵심원칙
1. 19세기 이전 전통적 점령 개념의 발전
2. 19세기 근대적 점령 개념 으로의 전환과 국제점령법의 핵심원칙
Ⅲ. ‘변형적 점령’ 개념의 출현과 국가실행
1. ‘변형적 점령’ 개념의 출현 배경과 그 정의
2. 국가실행의 분석
Ⅳ. ‘변형적 점령’에 대한 국제 점령법의 적용
Ⅴ. 결 론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

안준형(Ahn, Jun Hyeong). (2018).‘변형적 점령’과 국제점령법의 적용. 국제법평론, (51), 95-128

MLA

안준형(Ahn, Jun Hyeong). "‘변형적 점령’과 국제점령법의 적용." 국제법평론, .51(2018): 95-128

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제