올바른 확신과 교육적 대화: 『메논』을 중심으로

• 영문명: Right Opinion and Educational Dialogue: Focusing on Meno
• 발행기관: 한국교육철학회
• 저자명: 김재영(Kim, Jae Young)
• 간행물 정보: 『교육철학』敎育哲學 第68集, 29~60쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2018.09.30

영문 초록

Meno’s slave boy realizes his ignorance and successfully recalls the geometrical theorem through dialogue with Socrates. Therefore, we can say that Socratic dialogue is a great proceed of education. But Kojin and Rancière suggest different opinions about the dialogue between Socrates and slave boy. Kojin argues that Socratic dialogue is nothing but monologue. Rancière says that Socratic dialogue is just stultification. Nonetheless, if we can say that the dialogue between Socrates and slave boy is an educational, what is the reason? Socratic dialogue is not only about answering questions. The true purpose of Socratic dialogue is to make teacher and student encounter daimōn or erōs and to have right opinion(orthē doxa). When Socrates and his dialogist fall into madness that is heaven-sent or love, daimōn or erōs come to them and thus give them right opinion. So they can do great things and make their mind divinely. Based on these discussions, we will prove that Socratic dialogue is an educational.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 무지의 깨달음과 상기

Ⅲ. 고진과 랑시에르의 비판

Ⅳ. 소크라테스의 교육적 대화

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

Socratic dialogue daimon eros right opinion educational dialogue