본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

채권자평등의 원칙에 대한 재고

이용수 146

영문명
A study on the reconsideration about the idea of equality of creditors
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
최단비(Choi Dan Bie)
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第29卷 第1號, 243~270쪽, 전체 28쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2018.06.30
6,160

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Korean Civil Execution Act, Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act and obligee s right of revocation in 407 of Civil Act adopt the idea of equality of creditors. However, the idea of equality of creditors are empty in the process of practice. In the process of bankruptcy, there are several creditors who have priority such as a creditor who has a priority claim by the relevant act. However, the real problem is that the debtor’s ability to assume its executory contract to the creditor can be functioned as a hidden priority—a “secret lien”—confounding the bondholders’ expectations. The priority claim made by the financing after bankruptcy also has same problem. In this regard, the idea of equality of creditors became empty and have not been functioned properly anymore. In the obligee s right of revocation in 407 of Civil Act, the Act adopts the idea of equality of creditors. Whereas, the Supreme court decided that the creditor who get the right to execute can has a priority to be paid by implementing offset. The idea of equality of creditors in the obligee s right of revocation cannot be functioned. In this regards, the proposal which the priority rule should be adopted will be present based on the comparison between priority rule and equality rule. For this, the ideas of equality of creditors in the various Korean Acts and pro and cons between priority rule and equality rule are reviewed. Afterwards, the issues which are against to the idea of equality of creditors in the bankruptcy process and obligee s right of revocation are reviewed and the function of idea of equality of creditors will be reconsidered.

목차

Ⅰ 서론
Ⅱ. 우리나라 법상 채권자 평등의 원칙
Ⅲ. 우선주의와 평등주의의 특징 및 비교
Ⅳ. 채권자 평등주의에 대한 재고의 필요성
Ⅴ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

최단비(Choi Dan Bie). (2018).채권자평등의 원칙에 대한 재고. 법학연구, 29 (1), 243-270

MLA

최단비(Choi Dan Bie). "채권자평등의 원칙에 대한 재고." 법학연구, 29.1(2018): 243-270

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제