한국, 미국, 호주의 공학기술교육인증 평가체제 및 평가기준 비교

• 영문명: Comparison of Accreditation System and Criteria of Engineering Technological Education in Korea, USA and Australia
• 발행기관: 한국공학교육학회
• 저자명: 신동은(Dong Eun Shin) 최금진(Keumjin Choi)
• 간행물 정보: 『공학교육연구』제15권 제6호, 1~13쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 공학 > 공학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.11.30

영문 초록

The accreditation review against engineering technological education just started in 2010. This study was conducted to get the significant implications for the accreditation of engineering technological education in Korea from the case of USA and Australia which have reviewed the engineering programs for long time. We can identify some differences between three countries. We suggested the three implications for ABEEK. First, ABEEEK needs to provide the definite graduates attributes to achieve. In that point, Stage 1 competency standard of Australia can be a good example which provide competency elements and indicators of attainment as well. Second, ABEEK needs to consult the course-embbeded evaluation for programs to check whether graduates achieve the graduates attributes. Third, ABEEK needs to benchmark the cases of USA and Australia to alleviate the paperwork load.

목차

I. 서 론

II. 공학기술 분야 인증평가와 국제협약

III. 한국, 미국, 호주의 공학기술교육인증 평가체제 비교

IV. 한국, 호주, 미국의 공학기술교육인증 평가기준 비교

V. 결론 및 제언

키워드

Accreditation of engineering technological education ABEEK ABET Engineers Australia Graduate attributes