본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

프랑스 損害保險契約法上의 故意免責原則

이용수 22

영문명
The Exemption of Indemnity of a Wilful Act in French Insurance Law
발행기관
경희법학연구소
저자명
고택근(Ko, Taeg-Keun)
간행물 정보
『경희법학』제43권 제1호, 155~173쪽, 전체 19쪽
주제분류
법학 > 민법
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2008.03.30
5,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

French insurance law draws a distinction between the intention (faute intentionelle) to commit a wilful act and the intention (malevolence) deliberately to harm a person. The concept of “wilful act” has a slightly different shade of meaning from that of intention. As such, a wilful act generally exempts the insurer from liability. However, a wilful act is excused where it is committed by the person for whom he is responsible and furthermore the insurer is prevented from bringing an action of subrogation except the intention of harm the assured. In the case a wilful act, the question of what is the grounds the exemption of indemnity to declare of the concept of intention arises. On the grounds of moral sense, to preclude the assured from recovering, the insurer must prove that it was committed by the insured with the intention of receiving the benefit. However, since mere intention to commit a wilful act is sufficient to breach of the contingency, it is simply identified to declare the concept of the wilful act as a mere intention to commit wilful act. To make a definite decision, the intention may be defined as a mere intention to commit wilful act on the grounds of the contingency. It seems to be logical to interpret the action of subrogation on the grounds of moral except a wilful act. If the intention is defined as a mere intention to commit wilful act, the insurer is not liable for more cases. it is necessarily required the system for the third party to relieved them. it is a material element to be taken into consideration when we adopt it into our system. It is the merit of the interpretation that the grounds of the exemption is not good faith(or moral) but contingency which needs to be introduced into our law system as that of french does.

목차

l. 序言
ll. 故意의 槪念
lll. 故意를 보상에서 제외하는 근거
lV. 故意의 立證
V. 被保險者에게 책임부담가능성이 있는 자의 故意
Vl. 保險者의 代位問題
Vll. 프랑스 保險契約法이 주는 시사점

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

고택근(Ko, Taeg-Keun). (2008).프랑스 損害保險契約法上의 故意免責原則. 경희법학, 43 (1), 155-173

MLA

고택근(Ko, Taeg-Keun). "프랑스 損害保險契約法上의 故意免責原則." 경희법학, 43.1(2008): 155-173

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제