본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

여행계약에 있어서 여행업자의 담보책임과 책임제한

이용수 58

영문명
Travel Agency’s Warranty Liabilities and Limitations on the Travel Contract - Focused on the Civil Law Revision -
발행기관
경희법학연구소
저자명
박재훈(Park, Jae-Hun)
간행물 정보
『경희법학』제46권 제1호, 231~256쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
법학 > 민법
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.03.30
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Under a travel agreement, an agency provides comprehensive travel-related services, and the traveler is required to pay the agreed-upon fees in consideration of the services. Thus, the agreement is a bilateral contract entered for mutual consideration. Therefore, since the contract is to realize a complete travel, the agency shall bear the obligation to provide full warranty services in that regard. In practice, however, a travel contract incorporates therein a variety of distinct services, and the distinct components, combined spatio-temporarily and functionally with the entire body of services, constitute a perfect realization. Due to the nature, it remains always possible for a claim to arise. In addition, fulfillment of the terms and conditions of a travel agreement leaves no tangible results behind. Therefore, the warranty- and liability-related provisions in the Civil Law of Republic of Korea are rarely applicable to this particular type of contract. Aware of the nature, various issues are to be reviewed herein: the requirements for a warranty claim, and entailing rights to performance, reduction of contract amount, termination of contract, damages, and safe return to home, along with the duration of warranty. Usually, travel agencies incorporate immunity clauses in contract, exempting them from any liability claim for the damage or loss sustained by travelers, which are attributable to their negligence. The law generally allows such immunity clauses as limitation of liability clauses and exclusion clauses. In the same context, it is possible for parties to exclude application of the Civil Law, or to reduce or increase the warranty burden. But the clauses are unilaterally biased for the agencies. Thus, it is necessary to thoroughly review and control them. In this context, the two types of immunity clauses, or limitation and exclusion clauses, are reviewed herein, based on the travel-related provisions in the 2004 bill to amend the Civil Law and the relevant German Civil Law. The public policy underlying the proposed amendment stemmed from the need to directly regulate industry activities by setting forth the minimum legal norms in the code to cope with the ever-increasing number of Korean tourists and relevant legal disputes. Since the bill has not been turned into law, leaving the consumers without legal protection, it is necessary to continue studies on travel contract and to enact a relevant law regulating travel agencies.

목차

l. 序說
ll. 旅行給付의 瑕疵와 旅行業者의 擔保責任
lll. 旅行業者의 責任制限 및 免責約款
lV. 結論

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박재훈(Park, Jae-Hun). (2011).여행계약에 있어서 여행업자의 담보책임과 책임제한. 경희법학, 46 (1), 231-256

MLA

박재훈(Park, Jae-Hun). "여행계약에 있어서 여행업자의 담보책임과 책임제한." 경희법학, 46.1(2011): 231-256

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제