학술논문
Legal Concerns of Financial Institutions in the Big Data Era
이용수 42
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국정보법학회
- 저자명
- Cho, Hyechan(조혜찬)
- 간행물 정보
- 『정보법학』제20권 제3호, 221~258쪽, 전체 38쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2017.01.31
7,360원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The importance of big data as a new source of industry development is rapidly on the rise globally. Commonly referred to as being in the “Big Data Era,” business analysts observe that big data will create new value both in public and private sectors. Empirical research shows that the financial industry will perhaps benefit the most from big data
capabilities by utilizing large amount of personal information.
Korea begins putting a significant value on big data potentials. Korean financial institutions have necessarily demanded deregulation of utilizing personal information to fully take advantage of big data systems for their businesses. Likewise, the Korean government wants to promote a favorable environment for big data utilization. One tangible effort is to relax the regulatory burdens as shown in Big Data Personal Information Protection
Guideline (“Big Data Guideline”) published by a governmental authority, the Korea Communications Commission. According to the guideline, personal information managers can collect, use and transfer publicly available information and customer’s usage history information without prior consent if the information is de-identified.
However, Korean regulatory agencies are rather cautious of allowing personal information utilization by virtue of big data because they experienced a series of high profile and serious personal information leakage incidents by big corporations in recent times. The Korean Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”), known as one of the far-reaching and austere personal information protection laws in the world, is a byproduct of this heightened
concern. PIPA strictly requires prior informed consent when a person collects or utilizes other person’s personal information.
With the backdrop of this arguably tense atmosphere in Korea, this thesis will attempt to deal with the relevant legal issues surrounding financial institutions’ use of publicly available information and usage history information without prior consent. First, it is posited that it is too risky for financial institutions to solely rely on the Big Data Guideline because it is an administrative rule, lacking relevant statutory basis. Second, de-identification as a
sole prerequisite to consent exemption is a vulnerable method. Information profiling enables re-identification of once de-identified personal information, and thus the re-identified information should be subject to PIPA’s prior consent requirement. Especially, much of usage history information is sensitive information where PIPA adds extra caution. Third, taking publicly available personal information for profit is against the Constitutional right of self-determination on personal information.
In order to fully appreciate the merits of big data but minimizing infringement of personal information rights, this thesis delivers two possible suggestions. First, PIPA should be amended with possibly three options to relieve or relax the current statutory regulation. The administrative rule alone, possibly conflicting with PIPA, falls short of
truly encouraging financial institutions to benefit the value of big data given the reality of harsh potential penalties under PIPA. Secondly, anonymization should be adopted instead of de-identification as a pre-condition to allow personal information utilization without prior consent as UK, EU and Japan.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Financial Institutions’ Use of Personal Information and Customers’ Awareness
1. Insurance Companies
2. Credit Card Companies
3. Banks
4. Customers’ Awareness
Ⅲ. The Korean Privacy Laws
Ⅳ. Financial Institutions’ Legal Concerns When Using Personal Information
1. Lack of Statutory Basis of Big Data Guideline
2. Problems of De-identification
3. Financial Institutions’ Dilemma
Ⅴ. Suggestions for Legitimate Use as well as Privacy Protection
1. Amendment of PIPA
2. Adopting Anonymization Instead of De-identification
Ⅵ. Conclusion
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미분배보상금의 활용 방안에 대한 연구
- Legal Concerns of Financial Institutions in the Big Data Era
- 인공지능 창작물의 저작권 보호
- 퍼블리시티권 침해에 대한 위자료 산정기준에 대한 연구
- 후발의약품 진입 후 신약 보험약가 인하와 손실 배분의 정의(正義)
- 개인정보 비식별 조치 가이드라인의 법률적 의미와 쟁점
- 구 저작권법 제29조 제2항, 제76조의2 및 제83조의2에서 규정하는 ‘판매용 음반’의 개념과 의미
- 특허권 공동침해법리에 관한 소고
- 개인정보자기결정권과 잊혀진 헌법재판소 결정들을 위한 변명
- 지적재산권의 준점유
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 민법분야 NEW
- 보험법연구 제18권 제3호 목차
- 타인을 위한 생명보험에서 보험계약자의 채권자와 보험수익자 간의 이해조정 - 대법원 2023. 6. 29. 선고 2019다300934 판결
- 설명의무 - 보험소송의 도박화
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!