본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

「부정청탁 및 금품등 수수의 금지에 관한 법률」에 대한 형사법적 고찰

이용수 112

영문명
The Study of The Improper Solicitation and Graft Prohibition Act in criminal view
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
김영중(Kim Yeong Jung)
간행물 정보
『형사정책』刑事政策 第28卷 第3號, 359~383쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.12.30
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

“The Solicitation and Graft Prohibition Act” came into force from 27/09/2016. The Point of this act is prohibition of graft and improper solicitation for public officers and people working in the school and university, and press service. A bribe of public official and receiving of a person, who administering another s business differ in criminal law. A public official or an arbitrator who receives, demands or promises to accept a bribe in connection with his duties, shall be punished but a person who, administering another s business, receives property or obtains pecuniary advantage from a third person only in response to an illegal solicitation concerning his duty shall be punished. The Solicitation and Graft Prohibition Act contains a punishment of a person, who receive a bribe not in connection with his duty or work. In this side the requirements that are more concise than the Criminal Code. The Solicitation and Graft Prohibition Act can be a problem of excessive punishment raised in that the punishment of simple receiving not connect with his duty. Also, keep in mind that simply impose a prison sentence only in money or in modest punishment is unfair. By placing the amount of reference to impose criminal penalties, depending on the amount inherently suffers from the problems that divided the criminal prosecution, fines imposed. Unlike the punishment that bribery solicitation laws may appear excessive fluid medium can upset the greater because there is no punishment provisions. If there is an excessive difference between the water level in the penalty according to the proceeds of presence can cause adverse effects in its application. So leave the differences in penalties depending on the amount even in bribery, the court is required mitigation criteria for the proceeds of or not.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 청탁금지법상 형벌규정
Ⅲ. 형법과 청탁금지법상 형벌규정비교
Ⅳ. 청탁금지법상 형벌규정의 해석상문제점
Ⅴ. 나가며

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김영중(Kim Yeong Jung). (2016).「부정청탁 및 금품등 수수의 금지에 관한 법률」에 대한 형사법적 고찰. 형사정책, 28 (3), 359-383

MLA

김영중(Kim Yeong Jung). "「부정청탁 및 금품등 수수의 금지에 관한 법률」에 대한 형사법적 고찰." 형사정책, 28.3(2016): 359-383

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제