저작물 이용허락계약해석에 관한 비판적 고찰

• 영문명: A critical opinion on the interpretation of the contract of the authorization to exploit works in The Korean Copyright Act
• 발행기관: 세창출판사
• 저자명: 계승균(KYE, Seung Kyoon)
• 간행물 정보: 『창작과 권리』2012년 여름호 (제67호), 174~198쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.06.01

영문 초록

This article is dedicated to reviewing the interpretation of the contract of authorization to exploit works in Korean copyright cases. It is stipulated in Article 46 Paragraph 1 in The Korean Copyright Act that the owner of author's property rights may grant another person authorization to exploit the work, and in Section 2 that the person who obtained such authorization pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be entitled to exploit the work in such a manner and within the limit of such conditions as authorized. I think that Paragraph 2 of Article 46 is the most important clause in the viewpoint of economic interest of the author, because the author has the right to his or her own works and can control the exploitation of works through the copyright contract. According to the text of Paragraph 2 of Article 46, it states 'in such a manner and within the limit of such conditions as authorized.' This expression has special meaning for the author's interest in disputed and doubtful cases on the interpretation of contract to exploit the copyrighted works. It is evaluated, in my opinion, that The Korean Court has interpretated the contract of exploitation of copyrighted works in the same manner as it does with general contract of real estate or movable assets.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언

Ⅱ. 일반적인 법률행위 해석

Ⅲ. 우리 저작권법 제46조 제2항의 해석론

Ⅳ. 독일 저작권법의 목적양도론

Ⅴ. 저작물 이용허락계약 해석에 관한 우리 판례의 태도

Ⅵ. 우리 판례에 대한 비판적 고찰

Ⅶ. 결어

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

저작물이용허락 목적양도론 in dubio pro auctore 이용허락계약해석 계약해석 authorization to exploit the wroks Zweckü bertragungstheorie in dubio pro auctore interpretation of the contract to exploit the works interpretation of contract