[특별기고] 대한민국 특허제도의 문제점(Ⅴ)

• 영문명: A Review Regarding Problems on Korean Patent System (Ⅴ) -In regard to Inadequacy and Deficiency of Korean Patent Law and Regulations-
• 발행기관: 세창출판사
• 저자명: 최덕규(Dukkyu Choi)
• 간행물 정보: 『창작과 권리』2012년 여름호 (제67호), 232~250쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.06.01

영문 초록

There are many inadequate and deficient provisions in the Korean Patent Law, Patent Regulations, Patent Implementing Regulations, MPEP, etc. For instance, the description requirements under Article 42, Section 2 of the Korean Patent Law are violated by the Patent Implementing Regulations in which provides the electronic filing format of specification. There are many complicated provisions that could have been simplified and clarified as well as excessive mutatis mutandis provisions that could have been simplified. Further, there are no provisions regarding the definition of open-ended type claim and closed type claim which should have been provided. The test of obviousness of an invention should be more thoroughly understood. The test should be objective and specific rather than subjective and ambiguous. The 3-step test for obviousness and the four-step factual inquiry including secondary considerations will lead to a right test for obviousness.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 법령의 미비

Ⅲ. 법령의 불비

Ⅳ. 법령운용의 불비

Ⅴ. 결어

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

법령의 미비 법령의 불비 명세서 기재요건 특허청구범위 개방형 특허청구범위 폐쇄형 특허청구범위 진보성 신규성 3단계 판단방법 4단계 판단방법 보충자료 inadequacy of regulations deficiency of regulations description requirements claims open-ended type claim closed type claim obviousness novelty three-step factual inquiry four-step factual inquiry secondary considerations