‘적법한 절차’를 위반한 사법경찰관 작성 피의자신문조서의 증거능력

• 영문명: Violation of Due Process and Admissibility of Examination Record of a Suspect
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 변종필(Byun, Jong-Pil)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제25권 제4호, 325~348쪽, 전체 23쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.12.31

영문 초록

This paper treats a precedent of Supreme Court relating to the admissibility of examination record of a suspect which judicial police officer drew up in the process of questioning him. To answer this problem, it is inevitable to inquire into the relation between the 'due process' prescribed in Article 308-2 of criminal procedure law and the 'due process and method' prescribed in Article 312 of the same law. First, I examined here the current state of discussions on the 'due process' in constitutional and criminal procedure law. Second, I searched the meanings and contents of 'due process' prescribed in the above two provisions. Third, on the basis of such a comparison, I explained the sameness and the difference between the two. As a result of my study, I think that the relation between the two is the overlapping one such as intersection. In concrete, the two is fundamentally different from each other in its meaning track and application scope, but exceptionally overlapped only in respect of some objects.

목차

Ⅰ. 사안의 쟁점과 논의의 범위

Ⅱ. 제308조의2의 ‘적법한 절차’

Ⅲ. 제312조의 ‘적법한 절차와 방식’

Ⅳ. 양 규정의 관계와 ‘적법한 절차’의 함의

Ⅴ. 맺음말: 대법원의 판단에 대한 평가

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

적법한 절차 적법한 절차와 방식 법원리 법규칙 비례성 Due Process Due Process and Method Legal Principle Legal Rule Proportionality