간접사실에 관한 자백

• 영문명: Confession to Indirect Facts
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소
• 저자명: 이정환(Lee, Jeong-Hawn)
• 간행물 정보: 『원광법학』제26권 제1호, 373~396쪽, 전체 23쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.03.30

영문 초록

Defined as a party's depositions including the deposition about facts to be identical with other party's assertion and to be disadvantageous for him, the deposition to acknowledge other party's assertion which is disadvantageous to him, the deposition to acknowledge other party's assertion true and the deposition not to argue with other party in any condition during oral defence and defence preparation procedure. When these confessions are once established, on the one hand, they bind court and prohibit to use the fact contrary to them as basic facts for a judgement. It is the binding for the original intention of confession, the second theses of Closing Note. So the fact confessed need not to be proved, as a result of it, inquiry is promoted. On the other, if a confession is established, the fact confessed may become in fact spurious certificate, so other party may forget an aggressive activity for collecting evidences to the facts confessed. The reliability from other party should be protected. Accordingly, a confessor is bound by it and can not freely retrieve it unlike simple facts. it is the binding to a party, self-binding. The effect of confession reaches to even the inquiry of high court. Additionally, the confession in justice is acknowledged only in the procedure to adopt Closing Note, and is not acknowledged in the procedure to adopt Attention to detect misconduct. The necessary requirements to establish confessions can be summarized as follows ① a confess should be made on the concrete facts ② a confession should be a deposition done during defence or defence preparation procedure. additionally ③ a confession should be identical with other party's assertion on the facts ④ a confession should be a deposition to be disadvantageous for the confessor. In the above 4 requirements to be a confession, in the light of interpretation, problematic issues are specially ① and ④. Regarding the essential condition of ①, there are issues about whether the object of confession is limited only to key facts or to include indirect fact and accessorial fact, and about whether those confessions on right or legal relationships except for the above can be the object of confession, Regarding the essential condition of ④, in case of disadvantageous deposition to the confessor. what is an actual disadvantage to the confessor. In this regards, as the object of confession is a concrete fact, principally a minor premise of legal syllogism, the existence, contents, interpretation about a rule of thumb and legislation, that judiciary has to know well, can not be a confession in justice though there could be some conflicts between parties, For the matter about what confession means, it goes without saying that key fact can be an object of confession through the things that the binding for confession is based on Closing note and it is reasonable to apply Closing note to key fact at least. But a common view and a judicial precedent negate the binding of indirect fact which needs confirmation on the key facts, though both party's depositions are same. On the other hand, the binding of confession is acknowledged by the petition through the establishment of documentary evidence specially, which is accepted as a key fact, among accessorial facts. But some theories claim strongly to acknowledge the confessions for indirect facts and accessorial facts recently. So this study tries to define the concept and classification of key fact and indirect fact in advance, and the binding on the original intention of confession for indirect fact, and the binding to the confessor for researching the issues about whether the fact to be a object of confession is limited to key fact or indirect fact is also included for the requirements to establish confessions.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. 주요사실과 간접사실의 구별

Ⅲ. 간접사실 자백의 법원에 대한 구속력

Ⅳ. 간접사실 자백의 당사자에 대한 구속력

Ⅴ. 결 어

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

재판상의 자백 주요사실 간접사실 자백의 구속력 변론주의 Confession in the Justice Indirect Acts The Binding for Confession Key Facts Closing Note