집합명칭에 의한 모욕에서 피해자의 특정

• 영문명: Victim-Fixing in Contempt by Collective Name
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 변종필(Byun, Jong-Pil)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제24권 제3호, 339~364쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.09.30

영문 초록

This is a treatise which analyzed and criticized the attitude of precedents relating to victim-fixing in contempt by collective name(Kollektiv-bezeichnung in German). According to precedents, it can not be a case of contempt in principle when insult is enacted in the manner of collective concept. But precedents say that contempt is exceptionally established when the contents of insulting remarks or expressions come up to all members of the relevant group and, consequently, become to have a negative effect in social evaluation about each person of them. In short, precedents accept contempt when the possibility of violating legal interest(person-value) exists. I agree to this position in principle. By the way, precedents suggest so-called several-elements-perspective as normative criterion to evaluate whether such a possibility exists or not. I think that the perspective has some problems in itself, especially in practice. The most important one is that judgment may be suspected of its appropriateness because of uncertainty of priority-relation between elements in the process of their application.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기 - 논의의 쟁점

Ⅱ. 집합명칭에 의한 모욕과 피해자 특정

Ⅲ. [대상판례]에 대한 평가

Ⅳ. 맺음말

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

모욕죄 피해자특정 집합명칭에 의한 모욕 합리적 논증 Contempt Victim-Fixing Contempt by Collective Name Rational Argumentation