본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

객관의무의 구체화와 검사의 권한통제

이용수 144

영문명
The materialization of objective responsibility & control of prosecutors’ power
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
박성민(Park, Sung-Min)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제24권 제3호, 237~260쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.09.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The prosecutor is the sovereign institution with strong power in criminal procedure. Prosecutors have right of investigation, indictment and enforcement of trial in criminal procedure. Especially, prosecutor’s right of investigation and indictment is the strong power to restrict citizen’s freedom in the viewpoint of punishing power of the sovereignty, in parallel with the jurisdictional right of the Court. However recently, such powers of prosecutor are regarded as the subject to be controlled. Furthermore, it is also a problem that there are no proper alternatives available to control and contain the powers of prosecutors. Existing alternatives are not suitable to become reasonable measures due to the concern that another powered institution may be created thereby. Therefore, it is regarded that the measures to control prosecutor’s powers need to be pursued internally within the Public Prosecutors’ Office. In other words, it would be meaningful to introduce stronger responsibilities and judicial control on breach thereof as the internal control measure, rather than by check and balance by other institution as external control. In this perspective, this study intends to focus on objective responsibility of prosecutors. Prosecutors are subject to objective responsibility while having strong power in their status as representatives of public interest as well as the advocate of human right. If objective responsibility can control prosecutors’ powers, this responsibility may be regarded as the internal control measure sufficiently workable. The problem with this alternative is that the concept on objectivity responsibility of prosecutor is not clearly established in legal procedure law, hence the scope thereof is only limitedly acknowledged and judicial control is in weak situation on breach thereof. Henceforth this study clarifies the concept of objective responsibility, expands and strengthens the scope of acknowledgement thereof, and provide the sanctions on breach thereof, so that objective responsibility of prosecutor is confirmed as eligible to become the internal control measure of prosecutors’ powers.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 검사의 객관의무의 의의
Ⅲ. 검사의 객관의무의 확대 및 강화
Ⅳ. 의무위반에 대한 사법통제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박성민(Park, Sung-Min). (2012).객관의무의 구체화와 검사의 권한통제. 형사법연구, 24 (3), 237-260

MLA

박성민(Park, Sung-Min). "객관의무의 구체화와 검사의 권한통제." 형사법연구, 24.3(2012): 237-260

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제