한국어 발화에서의 불손 실현

• 영문명: A study on the realization of impoliteness in Korean speech act: Brown and Levinson’s (1987) impoliteness strategies
• 발행기관: 한국외국어교육학회
• 저자명: 김태나(Kim, Tae-Na)
• 간행물 정보: 『Foreign Languages Education』Vol.18 No.3, 439~477쪽, 전체 39쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.12.30

영문 초록

This study has evaluated whether Brown and Levinson’s (1987) impoliteness strategies, ‘strengthen face threatening acts or injure one’s face’ as opposed to the politeness strategies, are available to realize the impoliteness in terms of Korean speech acts (especially, Korean drama). It is presented that Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory of politeness encompasses the potential of impoliteness: the speech acts are face threatening acts and the polite intentions are face-saving and polite impicature deviated from Grice’s (1975) cooperate principle. But through the limitations of their theory, which is concerned in linguistic strategies in the level of utterances and face notion as the personal basic wants not the social norm, Brown and Levinson (1987) cannot deal with perfect impoliteness and produce the non-politeness category in Korean speech acts. As the results of applying their impoliteness strategies, we found that they had no correlation in the rank of impoliteness degree and each of them conflicted, positiveㆍnegative impoliteness strategies appeared in onㆍoff record ones and in one speech act positiveㆍnegative ones did at same times. That is the judgement of impoliteness depends on social norms, social duty and role, context(social relations of participants of talk; verticalㆍhorizontal relations and intimate distance, prior situations and expectation) and responses of hearer through recognition of them.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. Brown과 Levinson(1987)의 불손의 잠재성(공손의 부재)

Ⅲ. 한국어 발화에서의 불손전략 적용

Ⅳ. 한국어 발화에서의 불손 실현

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

불손 사회적 규범 수직적ㆍ수평적 관계 유대적 거리 사회적 역할 및 의무 기존 상황과 기대치 청자의 반응 및 인식 impoliteness social norms verticalㆍhorizontal relations intimate distance social duty and role prior situation and expectation responses of hearer