형태소의 유형

• 영문명: The Types of Morphemes
• 발행기관: 서울여자대학교 인문과학연구소
• 저자명: 이정택(Jungtag Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『인문논총』19, 31~54쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 기타인문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.06.30

영문 초록

In this article, I tried to clarify the academic definitions of several morpheme types and the differences between counter types, namely free morpheme vs bound morpheme, root vs affix, full morpheme vs empty morpheme, lexical morpheme vs grammatical morpheme. The results of this study are as follows. 1. The meanings of 'free' and 'bound' in free morpheme and bound morpheme should be based on the meanings of free form and bound form in Bloomfield(1933). That is to say, free morpheme and bound morpheme should be defined as the morphemes which can be uttered in isolation and the ones which can not be uttered so respectively. 2. We cannot find any deference between root and full morpheme and between affix and empty morpheme according to their references. The terms 'root' and 'affix' were designed to focuss their roles in word formation. Then we don't have to use all of these terms, because of their references. I think just one couple of terms will be enough, namely full morpheme and empty morpheme or root and affix. 3. We cannot find any deference between the meanings of full morpheme and lexical morpheme and between the meanings of empty morpheme and grammatical morpheme. Even though the terms 'lexical morpheme' and 'grammatical morpheme' were made more recently, they can make some confusions. So we had better use the terms 'full morpheme' and 'empty morpheme'.

목차

1. 머리말

2. 자립형태소와 의존형태소

3. 어근과 접사

4. 맺음말

참고문헌

키워드

형태소 유형 자립 형태소 의존 형태소 어근 접사 실질형태소 형식형태소 어휘형태소 문법형태소 morpheme types free morpheme bound morpheme root affix full morpheme empty morpheme lexical morpheme grammatical morpheme